You can think of Oshii what you want, Ghost in the Shell '95 is right up there with sliced cheese, at least in my book.
Innocence unfortunately couldn't do what Judgment Day or Empire Strikes Back were able to do in their respective franchises but is still a worthwhile watch, even just for the (arguably better) visuals.
The only thing about the Stand Alone Complex offshoot series I absolutely despise and think the series would have been MUCH better without are those infuriatingly stupid Tachikomas and the unnecessary lightheartedness and comic relief they contaminated every episode they were in with. And of course they'll show up and talk in their painfully annoying japanese school girl voices in Ghost in the Shell 3 or whatever it's going to be called as well.
Alex Garland on what the Dredd sequel and threequel could have(?) looked like:
Innocence unfortunately couldn't do what Judgment Day or Empire Strikes Back were able to do in their respective franchises but is still a worthwhile watch, even just for the (arguably better) visuals.
The only thing about the Stand Alone Complex offshoot series I absolutely despise and think the series would have been MUCH better without are those infuriatingly stupid Tachikomas and the unnecessary lightheartedness and comic relief they contaminated every episode they were in with. And of course they'll show up and talk in their painfully annoying japanese school girl voices in Ghost in the Shell 3 or whatever it's going to be called as well.
Alex Garland on what the Dredd sequel and threequel could have(?) looked like:
And having his full and undivided attention, we asked Garland if Dredd 2 is still dead in the water.
“As far as I’m concerned? Yeah it is,” he explained. “My hope is, and I actually think this will happen – somebody else will do it. Not to be all coy and silly about it, but I think our film was better than the first one, right? Just to be blunt. And the job of the next people is to make their film better than ours. And then if they do that, then finally, maybe this character will break out in the way that it deserves to. But we’ll see.”
Fans of the first movie have been vocal in their support of a sequel, even circulating a petition to make Dredd 2 happen, and Garland revealed that he has mixed emotions about their efforts.
“It makes me feel sad really. I feel grateful to the people who’ve attempted to get a sequel off the ground. And sorry that actually what happened was we let them down. Because the reality is that a film needs to acquit itself. It shouldn’t need a petition. And the truth is if it gets to the point where it needs a petition, it’s in big trouble anyway. That’s the cold hard reality of it. I feel a sense of residual guilt. It’s quite strong actually; it’s not that residual. Dredd was a very, very hard movie to work on, for all sorts of different reasons, and the reward would have been at the end of it that it all worked out. But it didn’t all work out. That’s the reality.”
As for how Dredd 2 and then 3 would have looked, Garland says the films would have grown in size.
“The first film we made it for about $35m, although quite a lot of that was to do with shooting it in 3D. Or a chunk of it. And we managed to make that film for that budget by locking it in a building essentially, sort of Die Hard-style. In the second film it was going to go out into the desert, which would be The Cursed Earth – people who know the comic book would know immediately what that means. And maybe throw some money at some key sequences. That’s how you do it I guess. I think we could have made it for another $30m, $35m type thing. We could have made it for $30m if we shot it in 2D. $35m maybe 3D I guess. Of that order. But the third one that would have been more expensive, because it would have been going back to the city and maybe bringing in some Dark Judges or something like that.”
Sadly however, it looks like we’ll never get to see his vision.