Search results

I can´t understand developers, really you prefer a bit better graphics over more potencially buyers? After doesn´t cry over lower sales

I have a Macbook pro retina with 650m GPU with 1 GB GDDR5, on windows: 1280x720 high settings - 40-50fps. 1080p low settings 30-40 fps. 1080p medium settings i have around 20-30 fps. Although the 650m from my computer have equivalent speeds to 660m notebooks, I don´t think he need try so...

Are you sure you are reading to me? This game in Windows on same machine: 1280x720 high profile = 40-60 fps. Mac version 1280x720 low profile = 15-20fps. I can to play on windows even to 1080p and low profile to 30-40 fps. MBPr can to play the most window´s games to 1080p high settings. Anyway...

Sure Same machine, using FRAPS in windows, OpenGL profiler in Mac: Bootcamp: 1280x720 Ultra details (Ubersampling off) = 40-60 fps Mac: 848x480 Low details = 15-30 fps Bootcamp: 1980x1020 Low details = 30-50 fps Mac: 1280x720 Low details = 10-20 Bootcamp: 1980x1020 High Details = 10-20 fps...

Come on, I don't believe it! First: I can´t find FAQ for Mac version Second: OpenGL run better in Mac than windows in this machine!, if there are problems with drivers, OpenGL would run better in Bootcamps. Thirst: nVIdia drivers...

Real Mac requeriments? no way! I have a Macbook pro retina. According to the de Appstore description the requeriments are 1440x900 medium settings for this machine. I have been testing 848x480 (low settings) always run below 30 fps. What the hell are those requeriments you are giving??? This...

Mac version sucks, if you think the game plays fine in your Mac, install windows and bootcamp, and you will see that 680MX can to do really.

Intel HD 4000 it´s between a 50% and 60% more powerful than XBOX 360 EXYNOS. The problem isn´t the card, it´s the game, Witcher 2 PC performance sucks!. For example, Mass effect 3 same resolution and level details : XBOX 360: 25-30 fps (Vsync off) PS3: 15-30 fps (vsync off) HD 4000: 40-45 fps...