Search results

Just because they can does not mean that they should. What do CDPR have to gain from doing this? Ciri is not the reason that this game is so highly anticipated.

I've never seen a community dive so deep into an easter egg before. They think what Ciri said is some sort of proof she will be in the game forgetting that all it was was just an off handed comment referring to CDPR's development of CP77. It's like the Skyrim easter egg in DOOM 2016. It does not...

You do know what easter eggs are in games right? It was an off handed comment hinting at CDPR's development of CP2077 at the time. It doesn't mean the two universes are suddenly linked together. I guarantee this game will have easter eggs hinting at the Witcher universe as well.

CDPR drop an easter egg about their Cyberpunk universe in a small off handed comment by Ciri and now fans believe it means that she will make an appearance in the game. That's ridiculous.

You don't need ultra HD 4k cocks for a good gameplay experience.

We don't even know the full extent of mechanics and features of this game so I'd wait a little longer before posting a thread like this.

Not quite. No form of transport comes completely close and cheap as it is to go across the world as quickly as aircraft do. Even if that were remotely true that corporations would go out of business, the Aviation Industry is a multi trillion dollar industry. If it were so fragile that conceptual...

No, you don't seem to completely understand what I'm trying to say. Flying is not just jump on a plane that flies direct from point A to point B. It is a very complex procedural flight following precise departure procedures, tracking with set airways, entering various airspace controlled by...

Putting technology aside the biggest issue that flying cars produce are the logistics of it. I'd imagine big international bodies like ICAO and the Aviation Industry would be heavily against it.

I think I just had a stroke attempting to understand your post.

Try and be a little consistent here because I have no idea what you are on about right now.

You'll be fine. This won't be another bout of shenanigans like the "You can't max Battlefield 3" debacle back before its release.

Developers can be as respectful to the original background material as much as they want to. The fact remains if developers don't utilize that area effectively then the game play becomes dull. A game that looks nice doesn't mean that it is a good game. I'll give you some examples. The Crew...

Give me an example where poor use of a fantastic game world leads to a good game.

Why would they think otherwise? Designing a game with style over substance in mind leads to a very empty and shallow game. Developers are more than capable making up for deficiencies in a game world by utilizing that space very well.

Just skim through the early pages of this thread and ask yourself if those people were really joking around.

GTA V was heavily influenced by Los Angeles. I really don't understand how this makes the games boring as the gameplay utilizing that map space more than makes up for it, especially in the case of GTAV and Sleeping Dogs. Watch Dogs to a lesser extent. Every open world game generally has elements...

What makes you say this?

Or they could choose to focus more resources and times on features that increase gameplay quality and replay value.

It's a CGI trailer. CDPR also said you choose how the game plays out. I wouldn't be too surprised if they are showcasing a different perspective from the other V.