So Geralts really not supposed to be with triss in witcher 3? Like have the house with her and things in the end? The developers wanted you to stay with Yennefer cause i guess thats how the story goes?
Well, that's obviously up the interpretation, but if you are asking for my personal option then - absolutely (time to get crucified, but so what, this is all things Triss thread).
I pretty much think Triss' romance in TW3 is hamfisted into the game just for the sake of it being in there and it really makes no sense.. When you realize that at the end of TW2:
1) Geralt remembers everything about Yennefer and Ciri, including the stuff with Lodge (and with whom Triss sided there)
2) Geralt fully realizes Triss has him guided into a relationship with her through lies and directly taking the advantage of the knowledge she possessed about his and Yennefer's relationship
3) Geralt realizes that Triss does not tell him anything about Yennefer for that very purpose AND would've continued doing so if he didn't have his Rivia flashback while talking to Roche in the prison
I mean let's step out of the game/story frame for a moment. I am not even talking in the context of "Who is canon and who is not". Would you go back to that kind of woman just because you had a 3-5 months long flick with her under false pretenses? Yeah, she also does some good stuff and evolves a bit, but the points raised stand extremly tall on my DANGER, DO NOT TOUCH sign. Would you trust her after that? I certainly would not and I see no reason why Geralt, him especially, would as his memories of Yennefer are more powerful than anything I can just make up in my mind right now.
Now I really need to sleep. Good night, sers and ladies.