-
Why the person above you should be banned
^Banned for trying to be endearing with your Stan & Ollie number, you're not fooling anyone wannabe skynet. -
Why the person above you should be banned
^Banned for endangering child lives by freely distributing real bans. -
Why the person above you should be banned
^Banned for scapegoating. ^_^ -
-
-
Why the person above you should be banned
^Banned for not bringing treats. -
Why the person above you should be banned
^Maybe aunt Mei's melancholy made the makers misalign their tiMEtable emanating in the impediment, ban. -
Buff or Nerf?
Maybe a lot of old cards could recieve a buff in terms of extra value with devotion. -
Why the person above you should be banned
^Banned because your ban is condescending towards other bans. -
-
Why the person above you should be banned
Banned for exaggerating the word stretch into violate. -
-
Why the person above you should be banned
Banned because of the lack of purple prose, V would be disappointed. -
Guess: 66% Leader Commitment; 1 Card; 1 Turn; 19 Unconditional Points
It's funny how you call it a neutral deck, but it's defining feature is a faction card xD... Shupe decks are neutral decks, cause every faction can build a better or worse version of it. -
Leader Ability play rates and win rates in Season of the Dryad
Nice to see the "NG players are just bad and lazy" series of white noise machines are still running strong.