Recent content by TheTrooper1138

Exactly, seeing my character in an RPG actually helps immersion. I'm not roleplaying as myself after all... Really? You had any expectations for that after what had already become of BioWare before that? Agreed, TPP helps immersion in RPGs imo. Well, for one, Half Life aren't RPGs. There...

Except that cutscene was implying there would be TPP cutscenes, so your point is fallacious.

What absolute nonsense. Switching perspective works perfectly in those games and Cyberpunk wouldn't be the first FPS game to have TPP cutscenes. You're talking complete bollocks.

True, but customization was pretty weak in that game anyway, so it didn't matter much. I still preferred to play it mostly TPP and the non-dialogue cutscenes were TPP.

Pretty much. Or Vampire Bloodlines, which let you choose the perspective.

Exactly. I play RPGs to be someone else, that's it. I didn't mind the 100% FPP in Bioshock, because it served the narrative and it wasn't an RPG, customization wasn't part of the selling point either, but in an RPG I really wanna look at my character... heck, at this point GTA Online gives me...

Let's hope they receive the message... looking at reddit, a lot of people seem to be really disappointed with the change, so I'm not the only one. I mean, one of the selling points for the game has always been character customization, no? But what's the point of that, if you don't even see your...

Yeah, if this proves to be true, then my hype is officially dead. Character customization is one of the things I like most in RPGs (don't judge me), but I want to see that in-game, not just on a menu screen... this makes the entire customization feel pointless... I just don't get this...

I really had no problem with the game being FPP mainly, even though I prefer TPP in RPGs, but what on earth made them come up with the decision to have all cutscenes be FPP too? One of the most fun things in RPGs for me and many other is character customization and seeing that customization in...

I read the books twice, but my memory kinda fails me on this part, but I think he already was a Count in the books? Maybe not by birth, but gotten the title from the King?

Yes, I'm sure there are many therapists or psychiatrists in a medieval fantasy setting like The Witcher's... *rolls eyes* But she wasn't just abused that one week, she was basically psychologically abused since her birth, because she was treated like a monster because of the alleged curse...

Well, yeah, I meant best for the general population of the World, so the last one.^^

Nice rebuttal. But don't worry, I already knew you had no idea about this stuff. ;)

Best "political" ending? So, the way I see it, there's only bad endings politically, but which is the smallest evil? Obviously, Radovid is the worst choice and has to die, no question about that, so that leaves two options. On my first playthrough I went with the Temeria/Nilfgaard...

No, Witcher ending is the "good" ending and it's also the most Sapkowski like ending, so I would consider it the most canon one. Dude, just stop it, you obviously have no fucking clue about how mental illnesses work. She was clearly traumatized and probably had one or several personality...