Recent content by SkiZophreniC

Shupe is a classical, but my all time favorite is when I dry pass the 2nd round after loosing the first one ...

You have around 15% chances to get the defender. It is not "absolutely guaranteed" as you say. I'm okay with that but it is not what the topic is about ! OP pretends that when you replay Bribery, the draw is correlated with the first play. Just quoting here : This is false. Why do people...

As always, complaints coming from people who do not even play the card. Bribery works exactly as intended. No conspiracy, no trickery in the Create mechanics, or whatever. When bribery is replayed you have a chance to get the same card available among the 3 choices. In fact, if we consider a...

I thought you had left the game ten times since I joined this forum. I almost missed reading your endless complaint about how the game is "cheated".

Dorfs are strong, but I think the main problem comes from that it is a quite straightforward deck that everyone may use effectively. The lower part of the ladder is thus bullied by something that appears unstoppable because it requires a good overview of the game mechanics to respond...

Fortunately you are not in charge of balance. The purpose of balance is not to kill an archetype just because you cannot handle it. - Mahakam defender are perfectly fine at 5. They are still useless most of the time. - Berserkers are 7 for 4 with random pings, on the long term. No change...

Blacklisting is already implemented. You cannot draw a card you've just mulligan'. This topic is kinda pointless... (Eventually you may draw it in a later round. I don't see any problem in that)

It shouldn't happen if you pick a leader from the same faction. Remember that matchmaking is done based on faction mmr so that if you have an unusual mmr (very high or very low) with one faction you will have trouble finding an opponent. When you switch faction your mmr change so matchmaking...

Queensguard is perfectly fine, I do not see why you would buff it to god mode. Right now QG calls for an answer without being unstoppable. What's wrong with this card ? It works exactly as intended.

This has nothing to do with deck building. The only thing devs can do (and must do) is to use the provision system to balance the whole thing. During the last months we have been through a major rework of the game with the bronzes strenghtening and NR overhaul. This is normal that there remains...

Lot of viable decks this month, I'm really enjoying it. For sure the last climb to rank 0 is never the most enjoyable thing, but it would be an error to stop now that you've reached the best Gwent part. Maybe your feelings come from the fact that you mainly played 2 decks from the same faction...

Because you cannot drop rank during the season... Without such a mechanism everyone would play at rank 0

I agree with the tutor problem, there is a subtle balance between RNG and over-thinning, and we are about to lose it. Portal has become a problem since the bronze rework. I'm using it in almost all my decks now. It should be shut down.

Disagree here. Oak is still incredibly good, I would not replace it; I like G:Igni too but adding Aard is kind of overkill. I prefer to use only 1 trap as you want to mulligan it in a short R3. Skagg can be discussed, maybe going towards more engines as the OP proposed is better now that...

I used to play Dragon's dream with Brouver, but I think it's not that good. Indeed it bricks in a lot of situations, and nowadays Brouver tend to be bled in 2nd round. I would replace DD with a simple trap, almost as effective and only 6 prov. I think the Skagg package is still good, at least...