Search results

It should be renamed Butcher Council. One archetype and a complete faction dead, and this is just the beginning.

Many of these were simply not changes with (primarily) balancing in mind. The game will lose even more users that way, but I can't say I'm surprised at all. The only interesting thing left in Gwent will be to find out how long the ship can hold out after crashing into the iceberg that is...

Okay, I've looked through more meta reports of the past now and still couldn't find any evidence NG is generally easier to play than other factions. You keep saying it's never been a secret that NG is generally the faction with the biggest amount of easy decks to pilot while still being viable...

You literally wrote in a comment to some other guy before "listen, it's been a known thing for as long as Gwent existed that NG is easy to play". This conversation is ridiculously pointless lol

Enslave is definitely not a typical Assimilate deck. Only two cards have that tag, and I think Torres (who you never want to play in his second form because he kinda got killed off). Nah, I was talking about the classical Assimilate with Terranova, Braathens, Vigo, Mage Torturers, Bribery...

Since when are Assimilate and Hyperthin considered easy? Dunno bout TLG, but I recall other teams consistently ranking Assimilate and Hyperthin as viable, but hard or very hard decks to play.

Ok, well that shouldn't happen... Dunca still had Veil? How many coins did he get, 3 or 4? If it was 3, then it was because of KoB. Prof's tribute is 3.

Lol, the nerf to Milva definitely made her very hard to play. Is this a bad thing? In my opinion, no. Funny how people who normally rage against control now say the Milva nerf was undeserved... just saying. Only with your leader ability you could easily kill 3 five point cards without any...

No, not really... ST is the same for many people what NG is to you. There are a lot of opinions and points of view.

The control-oriented decks of ST bear great resemblance to NG, that's why they are criticized that much. They're simply not fun to play against.

Adding another possibility of hardcountering certain decks to this already binary game is no good. We don't want another Heatwave. Nerf mechanics if they need to be addressed.

Decks you would never play yourself because they're different to your playstile (hence they annoy you more than others ever could). Others would say a "cheap" tactic, meaning a gameplan that requires little thinking or skill but can still match your deck. Last but not least decks which don't let...

I'd like to hear your suggestions, but I have to say that the poison one would just absolutely destroy the whole mechanic. I've also given up playing the game for now, but we should never stop wanting a better game.

Wow, you're really going a loooong way here to prove that you're right. I think Draconifors simply doesn't see as big of a problem in poison like you do (which is perfectly fine) and wanted to say that the developers seemingly also don't want its current state to go. And while you're right about...

I agree, the poison-mechanic itself hasn't been changed at all, it just got a nerf through Veil.

Letting overpowered cards stay overpowered and creating more of them so they aren't overpowered anymore sounds pretty logical, but wouldn't that leave the game still one-dimensional? Players don't have to draw their answers (Heatwave, Invo...) anymore, but it's still all about which player...

The only problem I see is the big overhaul which will be necessary to compensate the loss of these removal cards (which I think have the downside of being quite expensive, Invo and Heatwave costing 9 or 10 provisions). A ton of cards are already so overtuned that Heatwave has become a necessity...

Yeah you're right there, but even without Heatwave order abilities would still be too easy to stop. We have factions that can dish out an unbelievable amount of damage per turn (looking at you, SK). Furthermore there are locks available to every faction, movement against row-locked stuff or...

Sorry for the very late reply, but I don't think the wording in your original post is correct. Heatwave doesn't limit the devs, it's more like an encouragement/justification for them to create op cards. Heatwave itself is only as good as the cards it can potentially remove. [...]

Honestly, are the devs really that- and please excuse my wording, but it's definitely necessary here- stupid to think that a single card can balance all the op engines around? Maybe they're doing it on purpose to keep things spicy, but if you ask me your theory about them fully relying on...