well sure thing - but what does it have to do with if people could imagen 3rd view battle mechanics?
You can imagine a billion things, doesn't mean they're feasible. If the main point of your thread was to ask if people could imagine this in the next CP title you should have said so and the answer is obviously, yes people can imagine it. But I'm fairly confident that's not all you wanted your thread to be about. If I'm incorrect, then say so and I'll have said my piece right there and then - yes I can
imagine it.
okay you made a point here - spine might be a different genre true, but it doesnt automaticlly says that dynamic battle moves or finisher wouldnt fit CP in general - yet alone while so many player cry for fixing current ones because for them they are "core elements" (not my point of view tho)
I never said they don't fit. They could. But different games focus on different things.
i disagree here, if they would know and care their community - we would have been treaten differently - if they would lose "a sizeable chunk if not most" on the other hand is pure subjective assumption, how can you tell?
You seem to be conflating two very different things here. Being treated right and knowing what your audience wants are two very different things.
CDPR isn't known for it's incredible third person fighting. Even TW3's combat was rather basic if were being honest and flashy it was not. The community they've built over the years expect RPGs. Shifting away from RPGs will lose a lot of players. We've had plenty of threads on this.
If your next argument is that an RPG can have this kind of combat, sure, I agree, they can but resources are limited and if the choice is between this type of combat and the RPG mechanics depths, I'll take the RPG depth because that's what CDPR does - RPGs.
i also dont want to re-open this "versus-debate", just wanted to see if people could imagen 3rd person battles in general. "consensus amongst the community" is yet again subjective, there were a huge interesset in 3rd person all the years. its always funny to see if one speaks for the whole comm just because its his own point of view tho.... after all i got you personally wont like it - thanks for your opinion
Well you're criticizing me for speaking for the whole community, which I am not(more on that in a second), but you're actually speaking for me specifically here. I never said I wouldn't like it. Just because I'm not outright going "OH YEAH, I NEED THIS IN MY LIFE" doesn't mean I wouldn't like it.
Now as for "speaking for the community"... I am not. Go look around if you feel like it. There were plenty of threads here about this very subject and the consensus always went with first person is preferred for the next game.
I think you're interpreting me saying "consensus" a little too literally. Just because some people disagree doesn't mean there isn't a "consensus". I get that consensus means the group agrees as a whole but I don't think anyone here would disagree that there is a consensus on the earth being a sphere yet flat earthers are are thing. So let's change that to "majority" instead of consensus if you prefer. You'll find the majority seems to want first person to continue to be the focus in future CP titles. Again, plenty of threads pointed to that. It's not jut me saying that because of my own personal opinion.
And you say you don't want to re-open this debate but your OP literally ends with
so what are your thoughts about a 3rd person option for further CP titles? ^^
It's pretty much asking to re-open the debate.
Allow me to clarify my own stance on the subject.
I'd welcome the
option of third person personally. I'm not saying you are wrong for wanting third person, I used to be a third person while traveling, first person in combat type of person but CP2077 changed my mind around on even first person travel. I
personally would rather they stick to first person as the main focus but if they
can do that type of 3rd person combat
without sacrificing elsewhere I would fully welcome it.