Is there room to tell a direct sequel to V's story?

+
CDPR has been very specific on describing what their next few games are. The next Witcher trilogy is not related Geralt, The Witcher spin-off is a stand alone game, and the sequel to 2077 is well a sequel. The point though is could V return? I say this because, in one of the slides announcing Cyberpunk 2, we see Male V's face. Why would they show V's face if it wasn't a direct sequel? Also, the majority of the core team is moving to Boston once Liberity is finished. Now, it's more then likely that V doesn't return and we have a new protagonist. So, I dunno I'm spitballing here.
 
It's Cyberpunk, anything is possible. If a rocker boy that's been dead for 50 years can come back to life, then surely V can be a protagonist again. Also Sheppard died in Mass Effect and yet he/she continued to be the protagonist, so even an uncertain death is not an excuse.

All I know is I don't care what kind of excuse they need to come up with to continue with V... I want Cherami Leigh and her Valerie as a protagonist for the sequel and all other sequels to follow.

I'm even preordering the expansion the instant they put it up on Steam because I want more of Valerie.
 
The point though is could V return? I say this because, in one of the slides announcing Cyberpunk 2, we see Male V's face. Why would they show V's face if it wasn't a direct sequel?
I think it just means they haven't got anything presentable for the next CP game. I mean Witcher is likely coming first and we had an actual teaser and everything, whereas the next CP we got a slide. We don't even really know the nature of the next CP game either, could be a mainly multiplayer game like they wanted to complete for this one.
 
I don't know if there would be a continuation of V's story. If there is, that means V has a canon ending, or is 'somehow' still alive through some sort of plot device.

Star wars force unleashed 2, it didn't use the actual protagonist from the first game. It was a clone. Same memories, appearance, and abilities. Different guy. That could be an interesting cyberpunk sequel character.

Personally I don't care if its V or not. I'd like it, but I'm cool with a new guy stepping in. I'll take it a step further and say I like the new guy idea. In cyberpunk, V started off as a nobody. He'd be starting off the sequel as the killer of adam smasher. The guy that stole from Arasaka. V is a very accomplished guy.

A new character could serve to remind people that nothing you do matters. It's dark, and that's part of what makes cyberpunk cool.

What about V's implants? Levels. Cool stuff! Are they get taken from V? Seems likely to me. Starting from scratch all over again.
 
Last edited:
It's possible, of course. In a world where you can "map" an individual's brain and memories and "transfer" them in a new body... death is virtually defeated.

Question is whether they *want* to continue V's story. A fresh start could be easier for them to develop, write and sell: since some people are still blaming and critizing CDPR for two-years-old mistakes... this new title could be the right opportunity to turn the page and move on, refreshing the brand. New protagonist, new city, new characters. I suppose that the upcoming expansion will tell us a bit about their intentions.
 
2092.

You awake in a windowless room. Machines all around you. Tubes in your skin. A light, a lamp on a table covered with implants of kinds you've never seen. You feel the blankets on your bed but you're cold.

A man -- you think it's a man -- enters. Heavy boots on a concrete floor. You can't see him properly and try to sit up for a better look. You can't; you're belted in.

"What is your name?" says the man. You don't know your name; you say nothing and stare at the ceiling.

"What is your name?"

There's something not quite right about the voice. Like it's someone's idea of a voice, not what a man actually sounds like. It's too clean, like it arrived at your ears without passing air.

"What is your name?"

"I don't know."

The tubes rise from your skin to a point in the ceiling you can barely see. A little light flicks between red and green up there; red, then green, then red, then green. When you speak it's always red.

"Where am I?" you say.

"What is your occupation?"

"I..." You know this one. You can see it. Big console, two screens, a window looking down on the world. You're moving; always moving.

"Flying... I fly things..."

The light's red again. And blinking red now, three blinks then dark, three blinks then dark.

"What is your occupation."

"Pilot. I'm a pilot."

"No. You are not."

The man leaves the room though you never hear a door. The lamp goes out. The light above, red, green, red, green. You black out.

-----

Follow Grace, a rookie detective in Seoul Homicide 12, as she investigates a series of ever-more-brutal murders that somehow connect to the ghost city of Busan, and from there to America and to Night City, to search for a mysterious figure who vanished without trace 15 years before.
 
Last edited:
Pavel Sasko explained during a stream that the engram/Johnny is like a terminal cancer. Its not a happy story or a happy end. Although I like the nomad ending. So, I dont expect V's story to pick up.
Its always possible that they'll pick up on the nomad ending and continue from there(eventhough you have lost your 'soul'), but I dont expect it. The appearance of "male V" could just be for fan-familiarity with the game, rather than story reasons. At best they'll probably mention V in a future installment of the franchise, not actually bring him/her back.
 
Pavel Sasko explained during a stream that the engram/Johnny is like a terminal cancer. Its not a happy story or a happy end. Although I like the nomad ending. So, I dont expect V's story to pick up.
Its always possible that they'll pick up on the nomad ending and continue from there(eventhough you have lost your 'soul'), but I dont expect it. The appearance of "male V" could just be for fan-familiarity with the game, rather than story reasons. At best they'll probably mention V in a future installment of the franchise, not actually bring him/her back.
That doesn't mean that there is no hope for a cure. Mr. Blue Eyes claims to have something V wants. What does V want? To live. And they're willing to do one more gig to achieve that goal. Also, Panam claims to know people who might be able to help V. BOTH of these endings give hope for a continuation of V's story. It would be a slap in the face for those of us who are attached to our OCs to just do away with them after giving us these endings.
 
Pavel Sasko explained during a stream that the engram/Johnny is like a terminal cancer. Its not a happy story or a happy end. Although I like the nomad ending. So, I dont expect V's story to pick up.
Its always possible that they'll pick up on the nomad ending and continue from there(eventhough you have lost your 'soul'), but I dont expect it. The appearance of "male V" could just be for fan-familiarity with the game, rather than story reasons. At best they'll probably mention V in a future installment of the franchise, not actually bring him/her back.

But why give V any kind of hope at all in the Sun/Star Endings? If it's a "terminal cancer"? As @LadyMiseryAli put it.

The Star tarot description: "The Star is the card of hope. In the darkest of nights there is a light that shines the path to home. The Star is inspiration, motivation and gives us strength to move forward."

The Sun tarot description: "The Sun symbolizes success. It is a card of freedom, renewal and a bright future that lies ahead. The Sun also represents truth, for its light will always pull back the curtain of shadow that hides the world’s secrets. It also represents greatness and splendor."
 
Pavel Sasko explained during a stream that the engram/Johnny is like a terminal cancer.
I guess Pavel didn't choose the words terminal cancer for no reason. So there may be hope, but it doesn't mean that "the miracle" will happen :)
That doesn't mean that there is no hope for a cure. Mr. Blue Eyes claims to have something V wants. What does V want? To live.
Don't really agree, but that's my point of view which is subjective :)
Star Ending - V want to live, yes. But V wants to live a "happy" life, with peoples that she care about, peoples who care about her and peoples that she could love/like (i.e she won't be alone anymore) Even if it's not for a long while.
Sun - V want to live, also yes. But "mainly" to be the Legend among the Night City legends, which doesn't require a long life. Even if it means to let down all everything else (i.e people who care about her). That's why Panam, Judy (among others) prefer running away, because the main goal of V is not to survive or seak a cure, just to achieve her dream to be a legend.
So in both case, finding a cure is not the main goal, but again, that's just my point of view^^
 
Last edited:
I told you what CP2077's Quest director said. You'll have to take it up with him if you disagree. He clearly described it as a terminal cancer when people asked about the endings and wasnt to positive about the outcome for V. I dont remember his exact words apart from 'terminal cancer' but that is about the jist of it.

I actually, and hate is a strong word but yes, I hate most of the endings, the nomad one is the only one I'm okay with. My mother died of terminal cancer. The other endings are awful. The Sun ending is vague and the goals set in dont make much sense(like robbing a space casino).
I replay the game, but often quite once I've done all missions on the map, I forego playing the endings as a whole. There are two endings I have never done, I watched someone go through them.
 
The Sun ending is vague and the goals set in dont make much sense(like robbing a space casino).
How is it vague? It's a simple exchange of service for goods. V gives Mr. Blue Eyes their service aka stealing information from a space casino in exchange for something they really want that Mr Blue Eyes claims to have aka a cure/treatment for their situation. Why even have that ending and The Star ending if they didn't intend to continue V's story? Makes less sense to me.
 
"I can understand that it can be frustrating that there is, you know, no other ending available and I completely get you, my friend, but this is, you know, this is what art is for me, like, I cant imagine people talking to shakespear and like why Julliet poisoned herself, you know, why did she poison herself. Why Romeo commited suicide..."

"... sometimes, what you want to do is a bit more imprtant a story to tell rather than actually giving the audience like, the happy ending."

"... think about this situation as a terminal illnes.."

Its all from a Twitch-stream from 4 days ago, he also mentioned this article below. I guess that where he got his terminology from. But I have seen my own eyes what terminal illness is and eventhough you hope that there will be some cure, some experimental drug that offers a way out, terminal is usually the end.


"But in “Cyberpunk 2077,” I can ignore my character’s death sentence. As in other open-world games, there’s no “Game Over” screen for ignoring the main campaign. I can play how I like, ignoring the corruption trying to kill my character from the inside, while remaining immune to any fallout from that decision."
And thats how I play it.
Sorry that I'm ruining it for you, but its the way it is
 
As much as I would love for V to find a way to survive, the endings of Cyberpunk 2077 really do feel like a conclusion to V's story. Each of the endings delve into a different way of dealing with mortality (spoilers below):

Star - V decides to leave Night City and spend their remaining moments with their loved ones and family (the Aldecaldos).
Sun - V tries to finds meaning through their life in the only way they know how, by becoming as legendary as possible.
Temperance - V clings to life, even if it means ceasing to be their current self and transforming like Alt.
Devil - V realizes that even after betraying Johnny, it was all for nothing and will still die and finally accepts death.
Suicide - V makes the choice to end it.

In each of the endings where V keeps their body, CDPR leaves a small amount of hope that they'll continue to find a cure, but at the same time, in each of those endings V still coughs blood, as a reminder that they ARE dying. There is enough ambiguity for players to leave it up to their imagination of what V will do next, but from a narrative perspective, each ending can be taken as a conclusion of V's story.

If CDPR had wanted to continue V's story, I don't think they would have given us such drastically different endings for V. Having V return in the sequel would require either making an ending canon, or finding some way to reconcile all of the different outcomes (which would raise the question of why even have different endings in the first place), and I'm not sure I would like either of those approaches.

As much as I loved played as V, I'm eager to see the world of cyberpunk through a different perspective, so I'm fine playing as a new protagonist.
 
I don't agree. They didn't give us open-ended endings to just do nothing with them. That's shitty story-telling if they did. Terminal doesn't ultimately mean death. People have been diagnosed as 'terminal' and have survived. Alt gives V six months, but what if she's wrong? Pawel didn't say that V's story is over, just that the condition is terminal.
 
I doubt V would live s seventh month on his/her own. Nah. If the story wants to continue with V, something needs to happen so that all choices lead to the same result. V is somewhere being kept alive, and boom! Sequel time.
 
I doubt V would live s seventh month on his/her own. Nah. If the story wants to continue with V, something needs to happen so that all choices lead to the same result. V is somewhere being kept alive, and boom! Sequel time.
Or all paths lead to Mr Blue Eyes, who puts V through Hell and back a few times until they think they're done-for, then finally gives them the cure they're owed.
 
Top Bottom