CD Projekt Red seems to think the point of the game is dealing with the character dying. They've never shown any issue with the endings and seem to think it was their artistic intent.
In other thread, I wrote:
I feel like the fans and CDPR are never going to be on the same page:
CDPR: It's a story about V dying and what they do with the time they have left.
Player: So, when is the DLC after they get cured.
CDPR: There's no cure.
Player: Just, you know, when Johnny's not there because we're cured.
CDPR: It's about V dying.
Player: I know but after that when V is better.
Maybe they should have allowed the player real input into what they do with the time they have left rather than hardcoding the character on the basis of a rooftop mission choice. Feels to me more like Shallow poorly writing on top of pulling the rug on a game that's all about finding a cure, which doesn't seem to have much artistic integrity to me.
Last edited: