That's also my understanding and does confirm everything I said before.
Definitely not gonna go over well.
That's also my understanding and does confirm everything I said before.
Definitely not gonna go over well.
Well, I detailed a bit why that may be so. If you visit the list of changes thread and this post by Tvaroog along with the articles steadily trickling out, you'll see why. I'm not saying people should be happy necessarily, though it's what people have been clamoring for, but this all is painting a clear picture where these requirements start to make sense.
Damn, what internal resolution are consoles going to render this at?
Yep, both are incorrect (at least display the base game size).
But even on Xbox, the size could change until release or is simply not accurate too
Yes, good deal if you ask me
yeah i was also confused, so hes pretty much saying that all these requirements are not using DLSS enabled by the time they were testing this? and not only that ut also using upscaling res? or the upscaling means using dlss ? man im confused.
either way what a mess, you cay say they are updating the visuals and adding more animations and etc that will eat more resources but tbh i dont think that should make the game more demandind to the point of requiring pretty much middle to high end system to enjoy the game even at 2k lol what the hell.
This happen to me playing FIRE WATCH. Steam updated the game while I was halfway done with it. It then would not play on the specs I PURCHASED the game for. And naturally I cannot get a refund. I hate what the internet has done to my PC gamming.
The CPU requirements for the expansion are higher than Starfield. This family of Bethesda games (TES, FO 3/4, Starfield) aren't particularly CPU intensive. Actually, I was disappointed when I saw the Starfield CPU requirements, because I interpret that to mean that, beneath the shiny exterior, this is still basically an iteration of FO4 / Skyrim. The CPU requirements for Life by You, which is similarly simulation-heavy to CP2077, are almost identical to the specs for the expansion.
The GPU requirements for the 1080p, 30 FPS low ray tracing specs for the CP2077 expansion are pretty much identical to that of Starfield. I suspect that those specific requirements for Starfield are at 30 FPS, which is what the console version is locked to.
So, the listed requirements for the CP2077 expansion seem in line with contemporaneous releases.
I understand that this doesn't help people who are thinking that in a couple of months, they may not be able to play the base game as they're currently playing it on their systems. I hope that issue gets sorted out. But specifically for the expansion, I don't have an issue with the specs.
well when you see those requirements people freak out, its literally high end stuff in most cases here.
Well its natural, since most of the people playing cyberpunk play them on the old rigs that the game was developed for them back in 2020 lolol. I had a high end rig for the time, and I even upgraded it, but it seems that my CPU doesn't make the cut. A 9900k.
Notice that all other games including cyberpunk are all maxed out and my CPU doesn't break 60% utalization.
yeah but one thing is to have something middle or highend from the 2015 time to say something, even 2018/19 but something from 2020? and now ? i wouldnt dare to call ryzen 5000 outdated.
Even a 9900k is still good for cyberpunk, I play newer titles and it works like charm,
Daniel is great, and I recommend people bookmark his channel for further updates about this further down the line, BUT it's worth noting that he's saying those specs are overkill in terms of CURRENT Cyberpunk, not the upcoming update. He wasn't fully aware of just how much stuff is being overhauled for the update when he made that video, but he will be soon.
At the moment, the 3080 12gb does not even get 60fps in 4k/ultra...
What is up with those specs?
He also shows that the 3080 12gb, at the moment, can not deliver 60fps at Ultra/4k.
Just weird.
Also, is it just me or I don't really see many people using RT when only gaming at 1080p. Maybe it is just me, but I would assume that those who have the rigs to support RT at 60fps game on at least 1440p screens...
What is up with those specs?
Post automatically merged:
He also shows that the 3080 12gb, at the moment, can not deliver 60fps at Ultra/4k.
Just weird.
Also, is it just me or I don't really see many people using RT when only gaming at 1080p. Maybe it is just me, but I would assume that those who have the rigs to support RT at 60fps game on at least 1440p screens...
Last edited:
He is, very humble, smart and friendly.
If he is wrong, he will definetly correct himself. But I still agree with him, even the newest games don't demand what PL demands.
no game as in right now can justify the demands cdprojekt is requesting for this game.
even with what they want to implement.
The newest games may not have on offer what it does though. Just saying game new/game old doesn't get at the details.
Post automatically merged:
Please list what they intend to implement. The details from just the past two days have grown drastically, and continue to do so.
If he ain't wrong, something is...
On 6800xt, going from:
-RT Low, 1440p = 70fps
To
-RT Low, 1080p = less than 60 (30fps stable)
That is just not making any sense. Let alone the CPU demands.
Post automatically merged:
That is still a reach in my opinion, don't you think? They may be adding stuff, but those CPU recommendations are absurd (again, just IMO).
Even GPU... To go from 70fps, RT Low, 1440p on a 6800xt to targeting 30 at 1080p.
Or they are really protecting themselves with way higher recommendations.
I am playing high settings 4k, dlss balanced on 2080 super getting consistently above 60fps. The card they require for 4k/60fps now is a 3080 12gb, which is fine for native, but the twist is...
The 3080 12gb currently does not even do 4k/60fps.
Either RT became astronomically heavier, while non-RT 4k demands got lower, it does not sound right to me.
Last edited:
It's seemingly absurd on the GPU given we have nearly no details on changes for that - though I can hypothesize various improvements to the rendering pipeline based on the images we've seen. I know the cloud and atmosphere has been overhauled so that's a strain even if it's minuscule.
As for the CPU - that may be the way it is from the descriptions of how deep the ai and notoriety system are and they still have not detailed them in their entirety. It's not just police, it's not just gangs, it's not just the militia in dogtown; it's all of them with distinct archetypes and progression. And there are also going to be high level mercs that hunt you down for any number of reasons when you piss off enough people it seems. For that to work they've had to rework driving, driving ai, and physics among other things. And these systems have regional constraints. That's not mentioning changes to pedestrian and driving ai for civilians and Trauma Team.
Another thing, though small, are the appearance now of body physics(namely breasts). All the female body types have bones for this system already, but it's turned off in the current game - CPU hit. I'm not sure what the specific impact is as I haven't measured it, but I know the mod that enables this across all females can produce a hit for lower end CPUs. Yes - it's more convincing than any other title at the moment. It's briefly noticeable in the preview showing the character screen, but it's there when it wasn't before.
That they're apparently going to enable this kind of irks me because I had gone through nearly every model enabling/disabling the feature based on clothing, breasts size, faction, etc for my immersion mod I wanted to release soon.... oh well.
Again; These could just be high barriers to set expectations and your impact may not be that significant. All this is not happening immediately, I'm sure they will continue detailing what's coming down the line before it hits, and users on PC will certainly have a beta branch in Steam to remain on the current version of the game along with the available selection of version that Gog offers. As for Epic Store Front - well, almost the entire gaming community tried to warn people of this poison apple so... Dunno where this leaves console players.