Why exactly was NG nerfed more than SK warriors, Overwhelming Hunger and NR?
It was still nerfed way too much for the stats. Compare that to NR...Dude... wake up...
MOs have been nerfed af, it's the previous season's stats, you know that.
That includes non nerfed Caranthir, Auberon, and Ethereal.
Dude... wake up...
MOs have been nerfed af, it's the previous season's stats, you know that.
That includes non nerfed Caranthir, Auberon, and Ethereal.
I see that Scoia'tael Second Wind.
No, but I see it now that you've pointed it out. And I literally made that exact same mistake myself, very recently.Do you also see the "Reckless Fury"?
No, but I see it now that you've pointed it out. And I literally made that exact same mistake myself, very recently.
It was still nerfed way too much for the stats. Compare that to NR...
Which makes perfect sense unfortunately.... really wouldn't surprise me.Indeed...
I wouldn't expect NR being nerfed hard with CDPR releasing new content involving the NRs (theme wise).
It's just a suspicion of mine.
Dude... wake up...
MOs have been nerfed af, it's the previous season's stats, you know that.
That includes non nerfed Caranthir, Auberon, and Ethereal.
Most MO changes were not nerfs but content removals. Like Ethereal wasn't really nerfed, it was effectively removed from the game, nobody's gonna play it like that now. But the leading - apparently - MO deck the OH MO wasn't nerfed except the Auberon double nerf (which apparently was not as stupid as people thought with these OH results).
NG Single/Double Ball decks were nerfed way more than Overwhelming Hunger. And that is despite Formation hardly breaking even in pro, and this time with shitty play rate as well (so the pley-rate-gimps-win-rate theory doesn't apply). My question is why one of the weakest decks gets so many nerfs?
When was the patch? Wasn't it just over a week ago? How are you attributing OH performance with an entire season that still had ethereal? OH also ran ethereal. after the first nerf it made it more consistent.Most MO changes were not nerfs but content removals. Like Ethereal wasn't really nerfed, it was effectively removed from the game, nobody's gonna play it like that now. But the leading - apparently - MO deck the OH MO wasn't nerfed except the Auberon double nerf (which apparently was not as stupid as people thought with these OH results).
NG Single/Double Ball decks were nerfed way more than Overwhelming Hunger. And that is despite Formation hardly breaking even in pro, and this time with shitty play rate as well (so the pley-rate-gimps-win-rate theory doesn't apply). My question is why one of the weakest decks gets so many nerfs?
When was the patch? Wasn't it just over a week ago? How are you attributing OH performance with an entire season that still had ethereal? OH also ran ethereal. after the first nerf it made it more consistent.
MO was nerfed... deaths shadow....Kiki, Crones, Auberon, Caranthir...all were negatively affected. I think you have your seasons mixed up. NG the weakest?. ..I've heard that joke so many times but it gets even funnier
My attempts? I don't work with CDPR...my opinion has about as much chance of affecting their decisions as yours does mate hate to break it to you but the devs don't care what anyone here thinks.I hate to break this to you, but Jason Slama, Gwent Game Director, already mentioned in Twitter that NG needs love.
Well, that just hits the nail on the coffin for your attempts to nerf NG...oh well...
Let's hope they really do that... I feel kind of trolled looking at the recent nerfs and NG's win rates...I hate to break this to you, but Jason Slama, Gwent Game Director, already mentioned in Twitter that NG needs love.
Well, that just hits the nail on the coffin for your attempts to nerf NG...oh well...