I never claimed it was perfect and that nothing should be done about it.Problem #1.
Why ? It is a decent and fair deck (if we exclude Eist) and usually it is considered something desirable if a deck fluctuates around Tier 2 (which they were before Eist was released).[...]
I would really like to see SK warriors nerfed to the ground.
The question was why Warrior SK itself would need to be nerfed into the ground, rather than the reason they are currently at the top again (Eist) ?Why do you ask when the answer was in the post you quoted?
Fair point, the nerfs to the other top decks apparently only made the issue worse.View attachment 11220845
Having a look at season-to-season comparison, I'm glad that the season of the Viper started with a patch, although the patch did not (in my opinion) address the BoG degeneracy sufficiently.
Charts for Viper season will most likely see the following decks having high playrate: Pirates Cove (Bleinheim brothers+poison package), Pincer Maneuver (Foltest+Pavetta), Carapace (Keltulis+Ciri). So there should be some 'freshness' comparing to the results of last 2 seasons, but by the end of the next month we will likely be tired by constantly facing the 'fresh' decks.
And a year ago people said the same about ST and harmony in specific.I think it's pretty bad for this game that we are expected to just accept SK dominating every single month as a normal thing.
But I guess the devs completely disagree with me.
Just being present doesn't suggest a good state of play. SK has occupied that position for several months. We know Viy is the only reason OH is there, the card has completely ruined deathwish otherwise. No one will even touch the newly buffed deathwish cards because of it. For a brief moment I expected fog and frost to make a comeback and that lasted all but a few days. Arachas swarm is no better, it's the same mindless drones that frankly are just depressing likewise ST with uncounterable traps.How so ?
Every faction (except NG) had at the very least 1 deck above 50%.
Because it's technically nearly impossible(at least complicated compare to the interest it has..) du the fact ranking of players is modified continously.I still wish we got 3 seperate Pro rank stats, Top 100, Top 500 and the rest. But the community has been asking for this since CDPR started to release the stats, doubt they change it anytime soon
It depends how you record your stats, if you do them player by player you could take the Top X at the end of the season and look at their gamesBecause it's technically nearly impossible(at least complicated compare to the interest it has..) du the fact ranking of players is modified continously.
You can start a match being in the top 500 and be out of the top before the match end because others players have finish others matches in the mean time.
So I guess will never have such stats...
It's a different stats, as it will not represent all matches play in the top500 range during the season.It depends how you record your stats, if you do them player by player you could take the Top X at the end of the season and look at their games