Whoa buddy
@Marquis_deShade relax.
Is my opinion, it doesn't need it. The fact that the game "needs" to be modded to be "worthy" cliche, is not my point of view, is from those who think modding game is best. Or whatever else.
You don't need to come to over explain the obvious with other topics to come across your point which is obvious the different desire across the players with this game.
I mean no offense or disrespect. I've never been in an unrelaxed or agitated state in this debate.
I do, however, tend to be wordy, and my wordiness is not intended to provoke offense, or imply agitation.
I quite simply like to be very clear on my position, and there's a LOT that can get lost in text alone. Thus, I get wordy.
Anyway, you neglected to expand on the definition of terminology like "doesn't need". I felt it necessary to explore that definition, and opine my personal thoughts and perceptions on the matter.
No one NEEDS a tattoo, but, people get tattoos anyway.
There's a LOT no one needs, yet, many find such non-essentials necessary for any number of reasons, even no reason at all, and most often that personal desire is quite valid, even, and especially if it's unnecessary.
If it comes down to it, do we even "need" a Cyberpunk game at all? There's plenty dirt, mud, rocks, sticks, bugs and things outside we can make our own games with. No?
These are simply examples to illustrate there's a whole ton of definition and meaning that can get got loaded into vocabulary like "need", and "don't need".
Please pardon my failure to translate your exact meaning without additional expansion.
I took it as a universal implicit decree; You don't need, so, no one else does either.
As such, I felt compelled to RESPECTFULLY disagree.
Disagreement and debate on a subject can be had, yes?
Thus, I respectfully accept that you personally don't "need" modding support in Cyberpunk 2077, and that you personally don't think or feel it "needs" any.
While I accept that as your opinion, and position, I maintain respectful disagreement with that position on grounds of previous debates held in this thread siding in favor of modding support.
My base philosophy is that Inclusivity is greater than Exclusivity. I'm not a vegan, so, i don't need to make vegan food for my backyard bbq here in Texas, but, I have friends that are vegan, and, if I don't want to exclude them, if i want to be Inclusive instead of Exclusive, I'll include some vegan food as well as a broad range of lots of other things I won't eat, and even don't like to ensure that most everyone that comes over is satisfied.
Can it be wasteful? and more expensive? Sure, but, the satisfaction of everyone by including things for their own tastes, despite mine, as well as including the option for them to bring their own thing, beer, food, spices, etc, in my opinion is a little more important than shutting out, excluding, and not offering something, or at least the option for something else, even if it doesn't appeal to me.