Just before we talk about the topic again: Saying to somebody that he is wrong, isn't disrespectful at all. It's just a normal part of a discussion. To interfere into something to correct somebody without any reason, is on the other hand disrespectful.
Now you are still talking only about Vincent, there are many other factions and cards out there. But let's have a look into reality: Harald's passive ability only is enabled in round 3 (+veil). You can reach round 3 in two ways in this matchup:
1. NG wins round 1 and goes into long round 3 --> you most likely lose anyway against ball and enforcers, because they are better in a long round...so Harald or SW or PF doesn't really matter;
2. SK wins round 1 and bleeds round 2 --> so you either use Harald in round 2 without his round 3 ability (Vincent can't target him) or you can keep him til round 3 and win anyways, because he is too strong in a short round 3...so it doesn't matter if you play SW or PF, when your bleed is succesfull;
And you seem to forget that Harald most of the time is targeted by Invo, so against NG he goes often to your opponent.
I had more success with PF especially at an higher fMMR level (2500+). And against SW, your Vincent target is always Herjka, you try to get her and not Harald. So again, all I wanted to say is that PF is an good alternative to SW. In some situations it performs better than SW. In others, SW is stronger.
And to the meta reports: I never said that I know it better (it's a misrepresentation from you), I just wanted to explain to you, what meta reports are and nothing else. To be honest, I exactly said the same thing as the TLG meta report, PF is an good alternative.
Now I hope you came here to discuss about the topic