Also sounds like visual novels would be just as enjoyable for you as CP77 was.
- Status
You read something in five places, then it must be the unquestionable truth, right? Someone says the opposite, well that person must be someone who suck up to someone. Well, I covered gaming for 20 years as a job, I know what it was like 10 years ago and what it's like now. It's a fckng over politicized mess, and I hate it that ppl can't have a proper conversation because EVERYONE is at other's throats. Damn I don't know what this society needs to get their compass recalibrated...looks like i got answer from head of studio of cdpryou playing nice with statistics lol. have you did a research what gamers want?
And features i mentioned are features most important for open world games. If it was rpg nobody would cared about anything apart from story and customization. So your logic doesnt make sense. you can go and read what numbers means in review
Nonsense. Sloppiness should not be rewarded, this is exactly the reason why gamers have been shafted by studios/publishers for years now and it's about time this practice came to an end. If I spend my hard-earned money on a product I expect to get what is written on the tin or shown in the trailer, not a half-finished product that will eventually get patched in years time.
Telling someone to go "wind down like read a book or something similar" is plain rude and doesn't at all focus on the issue at hand, which is the shipping of game riddled with bugs, cut content, poorly implement game mechanics and absent AI.
See, why do you give your personal opinion about this game again, when i ask you for an objective review.
What you are doing here is not fair. You are rating a game out of your personal opinion.
-Graphics and Soundtrack are good yes, but does that automatically make a good game? especially a game that is advertised as RPG and OPEN WORLD. No, it doesnt.
-The Story is good? it could have been good if characters werent killed off right after you get to know them. Also the story looks more like an interactive movie about someone else rather than you but thats subjective again.
-There are some side missions that are good, but a lot of them are just the same repeatable stuff. Steal this, kill him. Get random phone call from fixer.
- Cars with bad physics. feels like you cant even destroy them. try to drive against something and the worst thing you will see is your lights go off.
- Skilltrees just give +10% crit or stats like that. If i talk about a skilltree i would expect a little bit more, like the perk where you can assassinate someone when jumping on them.
Honestly what you mentioned does not really make the game outstanding. Those are literally basics in an open world (except for good soundtrack. i agree very much on this one, i love the music)
Post automatically merged:
You have a Perk that makes you undetectable under water, but 99,9% of the time you are not even near the water, so am i supposed to love this?
Your dog comparison makes no sense.
Last edited:
Your starting point is yourself. You think that without proper AI a game must be a disaster. Well, people don't care. People care about the overall experience.
"endings render it completely unsatisfying for many"
Well, Cyberpunk is a fckd up, repellant world. Read the cyberpunk world recap. I stopped around the 40th tile, because it's nauseating. So what did you expect?
I had the f*ck of my life, damn, my balls are aching, can barely move next day. But my partner had spots on his/her arse, that ruined my day, and I'm gonna tell him/her that go to the plastic surgeon next morning ASAP!
Post automatically merged:
Well, I'm just guessing his state of mind. The game ended, great emptyness kicked in. So he liked the game and now wants more. Shit happens.
You are right about what you say, but was the overall experience satisfying and if so why bickering about these details? Hell, my wife is a model, she has 3 million followers, she is living with ME, but she has a habit of farting after sex. Well... it's your choice. I think you'll live with it.
We get it, Cyberpunk is a dark world with no happy ending, but why promote this game as "having multiple choices" then when my choices do not matter. If you do that, then give us different endings even if its a dark world. If you want to push the narrative that its a dark world and the ending is always the same, promote this game as a linear singleplayer story.
Sorry but that does not make sense. If i get choices, i want my choices to matter.
I agree, things like thermal katana is a bad mistake especially that close to launch. The thing is, there is a plethora of misinformation surrounding the game and the general public opinion developed a reflex to see literally "everything" as a cut feature and broken promise. Hence, it has been really difficult to distinguish between valid criticism and mere speculation or unfulfilled fantasies. Yes, I get what you are saying. And thank you for being kind despite the disagreement, something we do not see very much since december.
But...the fact that a lot if not the majority of people are actually complaining about the AI indicates that they do care....?
Also nothing personal but your comparisons are weird.
God I really hope you weren't actually writing articles for 20 years lol
Sorry I don't get the impression there is an actual discussion here with you.
Edit: Also are you a troll? Cause these metaphores sure sound like it lol
Not trolling you and no pun intended. But what makes cp story great for you?
For me story was bad because:
1. no choices matters, not speaking about ending but in general. Eve will die no matter what, if you kill dum dum there will be priscilla and nance mission will play pretty much same. Yes you can get sex toy vs pistols is it a real choice? Jacks will die, river story ends the same, peralez story ends same. Only choice is to do missiion or not. It is illusion of choice which is non existant
2. Linear story without any branching
3. Backgrounds doesnt matter at ALL. At one moment i thought that this game was envisioned differently so corpo get arasaka ending, streetkid go with rogue, nomad wiht panam.
4. no character development whatsoever, offscreen character kills
5. PLOT-HOLES like how office plum ( i played corpo) wihtout any military training and actually half dead zombile could take down oda (who is super trained and top augs guy) and adam smasher which is most augmented, top of the line, merc with most of experience with support of other arasaka soldiers. I can name few more...but i guess you can trust me about plotholes
6. how we were not scanned during heist by smasher or takemura...i believe they both had kiroshi
7. padre, we knew him he still says hello.
8. rushed and cut content.
so seriously what do you enjoyed? MMO type side quests? cyberpsycho missions which were one shot for me without any reward? or maybe story full of plotholes. I mean somebody like to grind stuff and spends their life on mmo that is fine... no pun intended. Btw have you enjoyed call of duty story?
I said you have problem with comprehension. You are attaching yourself to a miniscule detail and hang on it, like your life depends on it.
-The Story is good? it could have been good if characters werent killed off right after you get to know them.
Well, people just loved Game of Thrones and the shock it brought into their lives. AND A LOT of their beloved characters are literally butchered one after another. You cried there too? So according to your standards this is a negative trait. Okay, you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Yes, cars have bad physics, yes the skilltrees doesn't really have any sense whatsoever, JUST LIKE IN WITCHER 3. But we are getting back to the origin of my thoughts: people don't care, they want stimulation and a unique experience and are not hardcore players, they don't care about these details.
I love how you are telling people that what they care for doesn't matter because people don't care for it.
Just ignore that guy. Talking to him is pointless as you can see.
You do the exact same thing. Objective reviews don't exist!
It doesnt make it a good game. But it is very important for a good game, in every type of genre.
Right. Like every other of your points.
Like in every other game that ever existed. Even the godlike Witcher 3. Why does this make the game "objectively" bad?
Also, some people like repeatable stuff. Its not fair to say this by default a bad thing.
Right. However the cars get visibly damaged at some point. Don't make it worse than it actually is, if you want to keep your credibility.
Still the trees allow different playstyles.
I never said it is outstanding. I said it is not bad. And again: To say the game is a 9/10 or 10/10 was never my point.
I fully understand your criticism and that of many others here.
But I also think that a lot is measured with double standards.
There is a lot of space between outstanding and bad.
(sorry for my english. Its to late for double checking)
I find him quite entertaining tbh at this point. Waiting for the next methaphore.Just ignore that guy. Talking to him is pointless as you can see.
There are no double standards here. People here are simply upholding the game to the quality and standard that CDPR themselves have showcased/promised in the promo materials.You do the exact same thing. Objective reviews don't exist!
It doesnt make it a good game. But it is very important for a good game, in every type of genre.
Right. Like every other of your points.
Like in every other game that ever existed. Even the godlike Witcher 3. Why does this make the game "objectively" bad?
Also, some people like repeatable stuff. Its not fair to say this by default a bad thing.
Right. However the cars get visibly damaged at some point. Don't make it worse than it actually is, if you want to keep your credibility.
Still the trees allow different playstyles.
I never said it is outstanding. I said it is not bad. And again: To say the game is a 9/10 or 10/10 was never my point.
I fully understand your criticism and that of many others here.
But I also think that a lot is measured with double standards.
There is a lot of space between outstanding and bad.
(sorry for my english. Its to late for double checking)
Erm, GOT developes their characters - that's why deaths were so impactful. Witcher doesn't have cars. Horse "physics" are sort of ok. Withcer 3 skill made quite a lof of sense. Combat itself was meh - but skiltree was ok.
People's care doesn't change the fact that this game is mediocre in almost every aspect of it, therefore it can never be a 9-10/10 game like Badowskis is saying.
NEVER
People who praise Witcher but complain that CP is not RPG enough.
- Status