I just don't understand why people have so much hate for ball, or scenarios in general. Heatwave is a lot lower risk. Even not playing against ball or scenario, you are likely to get at least 6 points of worth out of it, not considering the strategic play behind it (remove a defender, an over boosted engine, etc.). So unless running devotion, heatwave is good to include in deck. Ball on the other hand, once removed only leaves you with a 4 point engine which will be a lot harder to trigger without the scenario.
Plus people seem to forget playing double ball also means you'll have assire, matta, and at least 4 (very likely more) aristocrats in your deck. So basically almost your entire deck revolves around this one gold which before could be easily removed. And they are not exactly powerful without ball.
I loved playing against single/double ball because it's easy to win against, unless you play one of the only few decks that are an auto-loss against ball (if that's possible)
Plus people seem to forget playing double ball also means you'll have assire, matta, and at least 4 (very likely more) aristocrats in your deck. So basically almost your entire deck revolves around this one gold which before could be easily removed. And they are not exactly powerful without ball.
I loved playing against single/double ball because it's easy to win against, unless you play one of the only few decks that are an auto-loss against ball (if that's possible)