Actually, getting back into it, I again remember that many people will just do anything to find the worst possible solutions in order to win, and Gwent is no exceptions.
Some cards and combinations are simply ridiculous (incl. some NG) and almost without counter possibility, and sees people replaying powerful gold cards over and over again.
So, what is my point here?
I'm starting to realize the only way to avoid such nonsense is to play with Nilfgaard, it's the only real way to have a certain degree of control and to avoid nonsense cards and combinations. I mean, what's the fun in not playing Nilfgaard. Sure Nilfgaard can also do nonsense, but I don't think I'm wrong in claiming all factions can. It's just a matter of which nonsense is most outrageous.
I think to play ranked I simply have to stop playing in a fair and decent way. But I don't want to sink to the depths of those whom explore the darkest and deepest caves of Gwent, so I'll just play a reasonably fair way with Nilfgaard as my main faction still, while I keep testing and playing a bit with other factions too.
Actually, you guys are quite right about that. There are very few proactive cards for Nilfgaard. There are few proactive bronze cards, and even fewer that are good (and don't depend on reactive gameplay).
Magne Division, Nauzicaa Sergeant, Impera Brigade and Daerland Soldier and somewhat Alba Pikeman are pretty much the only proactive Nilfgaard bronze cards without dependency on reactive cards. And one can argue about how good they are.
In my opinion Magne Division is the best one of those, while some might prefer Impera Brigade. Alba Pikeman is probably the "best value", but it's not really proactive.
You could argue Viper Witchers are proactive too. And then you have the assimilate decks too, but that's a different story.
Anyways, you guys are right, Nilfgaard is in many ways based on reaction, which in some cases I struggle with if the opponent force me to play in a proactive way. Depending on the draw it can be highly problematic.
Some cards and combinations are simply ridiculous (incl. some NG) and almost without counter possibility, and sees people replaying powerful gold cards over and over again.
So, what is my point here?
I'm starting to realize the only way to avoid such nonsense is to play with Nilfgaard, it's the only real way to have a certain degree of control and to avoid nonsense cards and combinations. I mean, what's the fun in not playing Nilfgaard. Sure Nilfgaard can also do nonsense, but I don't think I'm wrong in claiming all factions can. It's just a matter of which nonsense is most outrageous.
I think to play ranked I simply have to stop playing in a fair and decent way. But I don't want to sink to the depths of those whom explore the darkest and deepest caves of Gwent, so I'll just play a reasonably fair way with Nilfgaard as my main faction still, while I keep testing and playing a bit with other factions too.
Post automatically merged:
I think it is the faction which is based very strongly on reaction and not on action.
Actually, you guys are quite right about that. There are very few proactive cards for Nilfgaard. There are few proactive bronze cards, and even fewer that are good (and don't depend on reactive gameplay).
Magne Division, Nauzicaa Sergeant, Impera Brigade and Daerland Soldier and somewhat Alba Pikeman are pretty much the only proactive Nilfgaard bronze cards without dependency on reactive cards. And one can argue about how good they are.
In my opinion Magne Division is the best one of those, while some might prefer Impera Brigade. Alba Pikeman is probably the "best value", but it's not really proactive.
You could argue Viper Witchers are proactive too. And then you have the assimilate decks too, but that's a different story.
Anyways, you guys are right, Nilfgaard is in many ways based on reaction, which in some cases I struggle with if the opponent force me to play in a proactive way. Depending on the draw it can be highly problematic.
Last edited: