roundert;n7868840 said:c'mon people they can't use it for the wrong reason if u mute, reporting and regulating is in necessary as you shouldn't be able to complain about someone cursing or being salty or trolling once then being muted, seriously you're playing a game with detailed drawings of people being burned alive, stabbed in the face, sexual suggestive stuff, not to mention the witcher series need I go on. I thought we weeded those politically correct squares out just by the witcher series existing. ya let's show you doing it with women in brothels and naked women everywhere but I can't swear in the forums lol.
frbfree;n7868980 said:There's nothing about consensual sex that's not politically correct. People who believe in being sensibly politically correct can enjoy both this game and the Witcher series. This statement assumes too much about too many people.
Also, the in-game chat idea would be a menace for the Devs, when you consider that this is a cross platform game. You want me to make you wait to play a card while I hammer out a reply to you with an XBox controller? You'll be there all day.
lomvicmarko;n7869540 said:Menace for devs ? At first they can make it only for interactions between PC users and later add up for consoles if that is the issue but it is stupid that we don't get it because you chose to use xbox.
Just as we don't deserve to have cramped interface because it is cross platform there is no excuse for that.
Lantea;n7760340 said:No thanks, waste of devs resources, and don't need to see little kids rage quit each time you beat them.
Rawls;n7819160 said:I hope they don't do an in-game chat. My preference is to play the game when I'm playing it. Not chat about it. If I want to chat about Gwent, there are plenty of places to do so. So from a selfish standpoint I see no upside to the mechanic (though I recognize and respect that this is a preference that others disagree with).
Also, it definitely can be and will be abused. Yes you could create an option to not participate in the chat, but there's still going to be lots of incidents of harassment. People who harass others are going to push away people from playing. I want a large player pool. More players = more opponents = more fun.
Furthermore, I'd rather CDPR devs focus time and resources on making the game better than sorting through reports of abusive players. They would have to create some system to report abusive users. There is an opportunity cost associated with with having to monitor reports of abuse. They can't just have a computer automatically ban players who are reported for abuse - someone will have to look into the claims and see if it really is an issue. Do they create an algorithm that sees so many reports = instaban? Do they hire people to actually look into it? Do they have to keep records of all the chats on their servers to be able to verify complaints? Do they have to be some appeal system of bans? The bottom line is that means resources will have to be spent creating a system to monitor the chats and manually going through at least some of the reports of abuse. That's time and/or resources that are taken away from looking into bugs, improving balance, creating new cards, factions, SP campaigns, etc. I vote no.
Geneticeye;n7819120 said:I hope there will never be a chat for Gwent ingame. But for those who cant live without a chat feature try and talk to the gwent tracker devs - they could add a chat option into their 3rd-party program. I would be fine with that