This version of dystopia and cyberpunk was one of if not the lamest and tamest versions of dystopia/cyberpunk that I've ever experienced. I honestly didn't even think it was possible to be this lame with cyberpunk.
There are plenty of cities in america now that look way more dystopic than in cyberpunk. Look up some videos, lot of homelessness every
Panam and River already have all same-sex dialogues voiced so it's a no brainer to just patch them to not care about body type, making them bi. Kerry is canon into women so obviously add some voiced lines for female V with him and patch those in. Maybe then make Meredith a full romance option so that straight guys also have a second choice, or, like Kerry, just get male V's voice actor in to do the romance lines with Judy. Those seem like the easiest, most cost-effective options working with what's already in game. Representation doesn't need to be confined to the romance options, inevitably restricting them. You can still have exclusively gay NPC's in the world for representation. As for the often touted suggestion that defined sexualities are important for three dimensional characters...I played River's romance as a female bodied/male voiced V. At no point does he mention being exclusively hetero, it has no bearing on his story or backstory in any significant, character forming way, apparently doesn't even matter in 2077...how is this important for his character, again?
If we're then talking about NEW options in future story DLC's, god. Barry, Takemura, Emmerick, Placide, Viktor... (haven't reached the end so no idea who's alive by then). I won't speak for other orientations because I don't wanna assume who they like.
Making everybody bi was horrible in mass effect. Sometimes I think the best solution would be to set romancable characters sexual preferences at the beginning of the game. Set it for bi, strait, or gay. then have their dialog altered to fit your setting.