"What the next CDPR game needs is..."
Sorry sir, we only serves those kinds of bar.
Johnny Swagmonic.
Sorry sir, we only serves those kinds of bar.
Last edited:
"What the next CDPR game needs is..."
Johnny Swagmonic.
Sorry sir, we only serves those kinds of bar.
It's not like you to show so much restraint...
Good point on the lights. But BDSM and alcohol really don't mix.
The minor ones are expansions to TW3. They are pretty much disclosed at this point.
Depends if you're taking part or just being a voyeur.
I was so sure they would be new IPs...
One would think that in this day and age when violence and boobs (and violent boobs) are hardly considered "mature" in other ways than the sensibility of "not recommended for kids to see", mature would mean adult and complex handling of adult and complex topics. More deep rooted and multileveled, and unpandering (neutral, in other words), exploration of both difficult and mundane subjects within the terms of the given fiction.
But of course that's just my idea.
But of course that's just my idea.
Last edited:
I couldn't agree more. This is the heart of every good Rpg and more important then shallow dungeouns like skyrim most of the time had or romances. Even though CDPR tackled the romance parts pretty good it's not that important, for me at least. Yeah, it's fun exploring a handful of dungeons but after a while you realise they all end up very generic.
The Game needs good and fun fundamentals skills/gameplay wise, which can carry the game and stay fun till the end. Thats not achieved through streamlining, especially not in Rpgs. AAA Rpgs are drifting away from rpg elements, because of the mainstream market. Be bold CDPR, do the opposite. Afterall you guys say you are rebels right?
Maybe a reasonable middle ground in , there are some classes who could be pretty straightforward, but let there be classes which are more complex and have deeper roots Rpg wise. Thats of course if they stick with (you can choose between different classes) and i hope they still do.
Last edited:
I agree, a strong RPG element is what the next CDPR game needs. One where you can choose your character, not just class and gender, but also to a degree the personality. Do you solve disputes with the gun or do you talk your way out? Are a you science geek or a technophobe? Are you a nice guy or a hard ass?
So many RPGs seem to think it all about experience, exploration, combat and levelling up. But a real Role Playing Game is just that, a game that lets you play role. This means freedom in creating your character, not just looks but also skills, as well as the freedom to make choices in the game that will effect you later on. Basically the freedom to play that character as you see fit, combat oriented, non-combat oriented, nice, mean, however you want.
Modern RPGs don't get that, they just assign you a charatcer and tell you to go fight someone and level up. A prime example is Fallout 4 where you play GI Joe (or his wife) who is out looking for his/her lost boy. You do not get the ability to solve problems in a non-combat manner, and you cannot even be mean. You are assigned the role of "concerned parent" and every dialouge choice you are given is pigeon holed into that role.
As I like to tell people, the main difference between an RPG and other games is that in an RPG you play the character you choose to play as opposed to playing the character that is assigned to you.
So many RPGs seem to think it all about experience, exploration, combat and levelling up. But a real Role Playing Game is just that, a game that lets you play role. This means freedom in creating your character, not just looks but also skills, as well as the freedom to make choices in the game that will effect you later on. Basically the freedom to play that character as you see fit, combat oriented, non-combat oriented, nice, mean, however you want.
Modern RPGs don't get that, they just assign you a charatcer and tell you to go fight someone and level up. A prime example is Fallout 4 where you play GI Joe (or his wife) who is out looking for his/her lost boy. You do not get the ability to solve problems in a non-combat manner, and you cannot even be mean. You are assigned the role of "concerned parent" and every dialouge choice you are given is pigeon holed into that role.
As I like to tell people, the main difference between an RPG and other games is that in an RPG you play the character you choose to play as opposed to playing the character that is assigned to you.
I do like playing through decent RPG's a few times to see the effects of different attitudes on the gameplay. I usually play goody-goody first time round, or at least neutral. (This is often overridden if the opportunity to be a greedy capitalist without being a complete douche is available.) I then play a complete asshole - pure mean, rude and selfish. At least once I will play a paragon of nice.
Having those options is a must.
Having those options is a must.
if the pc version shares the same build with consoles that is imposible
what cd projekt red needs is go full honest about the game ,dont use sharpness filter, dont use anything to "up" the graphics show the game with consoles specs
for the graphic departament im keeping this game bar low after seeing the witcher 3
so dont expected a rise in graphics form he withcer 3
Last edited:
I not a techie, but I'd suppose they could increase the visual fidelity if they went with smaller indiviual areas than don't need to concern loading a reachable horizon.
Big sandboxes have started losing their "wow" factor anyway.
Big sandboxes have started losing their "wow" factor anyway.
if it mostly takes place in the city then it's not that big of a problem, since the buildings hide a lot and you don't have to render as much. the consoles can render great corridors, it's big open spaces than bring them to their knees.