About Blood and Wine (SPOILERS)

[TheImpZA]

Seems weak to me. Very weak. You shouldn't hype yourself up based off of something like that, which also directly contradicts what the RED's have said.

The monster used in the final art has no eyes. Coincidence!?! It's Philippa Eilhart, I've figured it out!

Spoiler

:eredinfacepalm:

 

[Pug.]

I really don't see the above speculation panning out. Marcin already said "As much as I would love to see Iorveth in the game myself, that's not going to happen - sorry. Same goes for Saskia." It's one thing for the devs to remain silent in order to avoid spoilers, it's another to intentionally give false and misleading information in order to troll fans. And that's exactly what they would be doing if Iorveth appeared in game.

 

[Toyen]

Yeah maybe I'm getting hyped way too much : ( BUT, I'd say there is like 1-2% chance it could be him!

 

[Troldierman]

A ridiculously OP vampire mage sounds quite fit to me. Not just fit, overwhelming! Oozing with epicness.

 

[Fieldcrab]

In the Witcher universe people don't turn into vampires if they get bitten by one.

''A vampire bite does not turn the bitten creature into a vampire.'' - :http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Vampire

 

[Toyen]

So, where do new vampires come from? There must be a way though.

 

[Troldierman]

In the Witcher universe people don't turn into vampires if they get bitten by one.

''A vampire bite does not turn the bitten creature into a vampire.'' - :http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Vampire

Who was bitten?? I don't remember anyone getting 'bitten'!?

 

[Fieldcrab]

So, where do new vampires come from? There must be a way though.

''Vampires are not undead or transformed creatures; they are born as vampires. The race of vampires appeared in the world after the Conjunction of the spheres''

Troldierman- I said it as response to Toyen's ''Iorveth theory''

 

[TudorAdrian]

In the Witcher universe people don't turn into vampires if they get bitten by one.

''A vampire bite does not turn the bitten creature into a vampire.'' - :http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Vampire

then there's the "Blue Eyes' quest in Witcher 1 which kind of (but not 100%) contradicts this statement..you never know if it does happen but it's implied that it does..

 

[TheImpZA]

Yeah maybe I'm getting hyped way too much : ( BUT, I'd say there is like 1-2% chance it could be him!

You know how much effort I've put in to try and find out what happened to him. I think there's only one person who wants to see Iorveth in the game more than I do, and that's @Marcin Momot himself.

We can safely say that the vampire character there is not Iorveth. You're getting excited for something that simply won't happen. Many characters lose body parts in the universe. Just because that vampire is missing an eye doesn't mean anything.

 

[Troldierman]

''Vampires are not undead or transformed creatures; they are born as vampires. The race of vampires appeared in the world after the Conjunction of the spheres''

All the so called monsters are actually post-conjunction creatures. Let alone vampires.

 

[Pug.]

So, where do new vampires come from? There must be a way though.

I don't know why, but this question reminds me of the following scene from The Office:

Spoiler

 

[Toyen]

This is so me right now : D Someone back me up here please!

 

[Fieldcrab]

All the so called monsters are actually post-conjunction creatures. Let alone vampires.

I'm merely quoting what's stated in the Wiki. I'm not saying the information is necessarily true / 100% correct as the Wiki's are after all written by ordinary people.(?)

 

[Rawls]

Take down the "keep Iorveth & Saskia in the Iorveth & Saskia thread" sticky for one day and all hell breaks lose.

 

[Toyen]

Hahaha : )

 

[Fieldcrab]

then there's the "Blue Eyes' quest in Witcher 1 which kind of (but not 100%) contradicts this statement..you never know if it does happen but it's implied that it does..

Can't comment on this as I'm currently playing Witcher 1 for the first time :smile:

I think I've noticed some contradictions between the books too so wouldn't be too surprised.

 

[TheImpZA]

Can't comment on this as I'm currently playing Witcher 1 for the first time :smile:

I think I've noticed some contradictions between the books too so wouldn't be too surprised.

The biggest one is that Adda is meant to be mentally retarded with greyed out hair, according to The Last Wish. In TW1 she's perfectly fine, which contradicts that.

I see this thing about that vampire being Iorveth is spreading to the Polish forum. Oh no. It's not happening, stop trying to make it happen.

 

[Toyen]

Don't you Regina George on Iorveth rumors! : D

 

[SMiki55]

then there's the "Blue Eyes' quest in Witcher 1 which kind of (but not 100%) contradicts this statement..you never know if it does happen but it's implied that it does..

Informations from TW3 and "The World of The Witcher" compendium support book info.