No, if you look one page back, you 'll see Eriash' answer. This voice we hear in the video won't be the final.PeteAgas said:1. Did you guys change Geralt's voice? I really like the original voice actor, make sure you re-use him for the sequal.
They wil deprive Blizzard of power with quality 8)I don't think there was too much resemblance with the novels. It was a self-contained adventure in the envrionment of the witcherworld.DragonX1979 said:I just hope you guys try out a more independent story this time... Dont get me wrong though - I loved the first Witcher-game! (One of my favorite RPG's afterall!)Though it had various elements, that resembled the novels story a bit too much - for my taste.eace:I myself would like to see Geralt take a hunt for his past, trying to find out what happend to him and his friends at Rivia. Maybe in a long sidequest? :
(...wouldnt mind to see Yen aswell sometime in the game - buuuuuut well see...) ;D For now the video - even if released unintended, looks really promissing to me! Go on like that and The Witcher 2 hits the 1 million copies inside a week!
![]()
Not to mention time-management. I am still waiting for SC2 ever since the Millennium Edition of Windows came out ;D ;DPetraSilie said:They wil deprive Blizzard of power with quality 8)
Guys...guys...you are forgetting Blizzard's meaning of soon[sup] TM[/sup]. ;D (sarcasm)I would be content if they took their time and made this. I prefer quality over a rushed project. After all, it is the quality of TW that makes me play it over and over again. There are a few other games I play that that (NWN2 and Baldur's Gate, for example). Yet, my playthroughs of those games do not number my playthroughs of the witcher.56236 said:Not to mention time-management.
You said it, I just can't repeat my wanting the quality over quantity when it comes to games. DO NO RUSH!! Although, I cannot wait for it to be released, man! Bit of a contradiction there.Darksavior said:Guys...guys...you are forgetting Blizzard's meaning of soon[sup] TM[/sup]. ;D (sarcasm)I would be content if they took their time and made this. I prefer quality over a rushed project. After all, it is the quality of TW that makes me play it over and over again. There are a few other games I play that that (NWN2 and Baldur's Gate, for example). Yet, my playthroughs of those games do not number my playthroughs of the witcher.Darksavior said:Not to mention time-management.
You said it. No-one feels the need for overdoing QTI's, though members are still deliberating the complete removal of them. Now, of course, I am against this... anything new is welcome by me.Ailarlan said:I haven't posted here in a long time, but now I just have to say: CDProjektRED, that's AWESOME!Please take your time and finish the game completely this time (no EE), and consider the implementation of the quick time events, we don't really need them...(if you just implement them into the boss battles, I could grudgingly accept them, but if the whole game will be plastered with these abominations...).
Methinks you're thinking about CDRealms and Duke Nukem. ;DSo finally it is more than an hope. Personally, I think the quicktime events could be made to work well. On the other hand, it could mess up the system.The outcome of a fight shouldn't rely on the player's ability to click in the right time (wait a second....).It should be based on their preparations and the difficulty the player has chose. Perhaps that would be an idea, the lower the difficulty, the more events. But as I would like it but it is an idea.I'm honestly not really worried about the quality and time for the game. I recall planning to buy the game in a September, and then it was changed to spring/summer the next year. That and the way the game turned out show me that the developers are willing to take the time to make the game good. In addition, having had an huge success with the first game, I doubt finding a publisher will be too hard. But then, what do I know?Forgive me for a second, I'm turning my center for logic, reason and control of for a second:THE WITCHER 2!!! HELL YEAH!Thank you, I'm fine again now.Darksavior said:Guys...guys...you are forgetting Blizzard's meaning of soon[sup] TM[/sup]. ;D (sarcasm)
Well, in part I tend to agree with you. The Witchers main plot and most of the sidequests are unique and merely continue the witcher world and the relations within...On the other hand, things like the apperence of yet another Source, becoming the "diciple" of a well known witcher and a sorceress (if chosen in the game), while being hunted by an evil mage and his gofers...Doesnt that sound slightly familiar?PetraSilie said:They wil deprive Blizzard of power with quality 8)I don't think there was too much resemblance with the novels. It was a self-contained adventure in the envrionment of the witcherworld.PetraSilie said:I just hope you guys try out a more independent story this time... Dont get me wrong though - I loved the first Witcher-game! (One of my favorite RPG's afterall!)Though it had various elements, that resembled the novels story a bit too much - for my taste.eace:I myself would like to see Geralt take a hunt for his past, trying to find out what happend to him and his friends at Rivia. Maybe in a long sidequest? :
(...wouldnt mind to see Yen aswell sometime in the game - buuuuuut well see...) ;D For now the video - even if released unintended, looks really promissing to me! Go on like that and The Witcher 2 hits the 1 million copies inside a week!
![]()
I totally agree! - Cut the hair? :whatthe: Oh my oh my... Dont let Sapkowski hear that! Shame on you! :PetraSilie said:You speak the words of wisdom.PetraSilie said:Go wash your mouth out with soap, for suggesting that! :whatthe:PetraSilie said:Why not just cut the hair?