- Status
I'm genuinely curious, in which games can you "shoot in front of view while turning the camera" without any auto-aiming involved? And why whould you need to look at something else than your target while shooting?
Yes, because at the very least it wouldn't have the presumption to be ''immersive'' and, at the same time, would be more cinematic.
The number of people who think CDPR can just "code in" a toggle ane be done with it amazes me.
You may view it that way but the corporate certainly can't and won't. TPP would require a new production pipeline because it brings in an entirely new set of problems requiring an entirely new set of solutions. It would be a feature like any other and it would certainly need to be treated that way by the team. When you are a 4 billion dollar company you can't afford to halfass features.
And seeing that they have specifically designed features around FPP that directly go against the ability to treat TPP as an equal part of the product, it should becomes pretty clear why TPP isn't happening.
You may view it that way but the corporate certainly can't and won't. TPP would require a new production pipeline because it brings in an entirely new set of problems requiring an entirely new set of solutions. It would be a feature like any other and it would certainly need to be treated that way by the team. When you are a 4 billion dollar company you can't afford to halfass features.
And seeing that they have specifically designed features around FPP that directly go against the ability to treat TPP as an equal part of the product, it should becomes pretty clear why TPP isn't happening.
In your subjective opinion its not comparable that FP is more immersive. In my subjective opinion its not comparable that TP is more immersive. That is how opinions work. Can you really not accept the fact someone has a different opinion on the subject than you?
How do I know if my body's fully in cover, though? My shoulder accounts for about 1/3 of the cross-sectional profile facing my enemy when lying prone with a sniper rifle.
That's why I said... we need feedback suits to make FPP truly immersive.
And then, Neo... then you must take The Red Pill...
That's what happens when you pull all the real talent to work on Anthem and let the interns make Mass Effect
The answer to the first question is: noone. That's why making it FPP without making it VR is a fail, like i always said.
The answer to the second question is very simple. If you are getting surrounded by enemies, you might want to check on those who are surrounding you, and not only to those in front of you.
I saw some people asking if it's possible to stop the timed dialogue options in the Telltale games and others answered that this would be bad because in real life, conversations aren't that way and this would be weird.
Guess what? I don't care. The lack of time to thinking about the situation and give the nuances and appropriate responses that my characters would give annoyed me to no end. I don't play the Telltale games because of this single reason.
Some people are unable to imagine that other gamers don't want that level of immersion and that it hurt their gamestyles. I don't want to react to the world, I want my characters reacting.
I have listened to an interview with Angry Joe. Well I don`t think that if you play FP you are more dived into process. As for me when I create a character I don`t care whenever it is FP or TP. I am still in the story, but I like TP from visual point of view.
I do trust CDPR though. Time will show.
P.S. All mentioned above is only my opinion.
I do trust CDPR though. Time will show.
P.S. All mentioned above is only my opinion.
T
I'm old enough to remember times when EA were one of the best companies and were even advocating reducing game prices because 60$ is too expensive. And look at them now - they went full Paplatine on us over the years.
Such changes do not happen overnight.
They did not start out this way.
I'm old enough to remember times when EA were one of the best companies and were even advocating reducing game prices because 60$ is too expensive. And look at them now - they went full Paplatine on us over the years.
Such changes do not happen overnight.
We absolutely need a third person option. At the very least let us go into third person outside of combat.
Cheers. Now that's the spirit! I hope everyone is happy of the outcome.
Which is why I suggest they let modders have the source code and let the Great Red Army get to work!
Wouldn't mind being pleasantly surprised myself... By an optional 3rd person mode they had 'forgotten' to mention
That is NOT what i meant. In reality you can still shoot in front of you while turning your head, in games you CAN'T.
And that is why FPP can NEVER be immersive, unless is VR (which, in facts, allows you to do so)
I will probably play this game, but for me there is a huge minus, that I can not see my character 80% of the game
In addition, three of my favorite games are all from a third-person (TLOU, The Witcher 3 and RDR)
- Status