I'm a bit confused about the sword styles in the Witcher, because the damage varies for different styles., and there are 2 types of swords, but wouldn't it just make the most sense to use the attack that does the most damage?
For instance, against a monster that is vulnerable to silver, why not still just use the steel sword strong attack that does 130-260 damage, instead of the silver attack that does 60 damage?
Or against a lot of the humans, why not use a silver strong attack that does 60-130 damage, instead of a steel group attack that does 10-35?
I don't really see the advantage of trying to match the sword type with the vulnerability, nor do I see the advantage of the group style or fast styles which do very little damage, instead of the strong styles that do massive damage.
Maybe someone can explain without revealing any spoilers or too much strategy advice, but just some general advice would be appreciated.
Thank you.
For instance, against a monster that is vulnerable to silver, why not still just use the steel sword strong attack that does 130-260 damage, instead of the silver attack that does 60 damage?
Or against a lot of the humans, why not use a silver strong attack that does 60-130 damage, instead of a steel group attack that does 10-35?
I don't really see the advantage of trying to match the sword type with the vulnerability, nor do I see the advantage of the group style or fast styles which do very little damage, instead of the strong styles that do massive damage.
Maybe someone can explain without revealing any spoilers or too much strategy advice, but just some general advice would be appreciated.
Thank you.