Although Triss wants to go through torture opo: , Geralt, if it is really in love, do not let her take such a risk. Especially because this could be finished very badly after all.
I did not try to understand, I tackle head! uch:
Can somebody enlighten me when this scene takes place?
this is from the sword of destiny trailer and never actually happens in the game
this is either cut from the game or a censored version from the tower scene but still it does not look anything like it.....
@DarkWolf1 Unfortunately, that scene was deleted from the final game. There is also a scene in that trailer with Triss in ecstasy suggesting a different love scene, that also didn't make it to the final game.
That would be amazing, maybe these assets are still somewhere in the game files, and some modder finds them later on. I think some of the animations originally meant to be used for Triss sex scene are reused for other characters, maybe those can also be replaced with Triss model. But that would still be a minor improvement at best, because I believe that the lack of dialog is a far bigger issue, and only CDPR can fix that.Then let's hope we get them and some other scenes with expansions ...
Then let's hope we get them and some other scenes with expansions ...
Can somebody enlighten me when this scene takes place?
this is from the sword of destiny trailer and never actually happens in the game
this is either cut from the game or a censored version from the tower scene but still it does not look anything like it.....
Hngg, that deleted scene. Just looking at that shot gets me fired up again.
I wonder what happened that made CDPR decide to cut all these?
Triss was hardly in the second game as well. I'd say there was about as much of Triss in the Witcher 3 as there was in the Witcher 2. Which is pretty damn generous when you consider the fact that she is pretty much a tertiary character in the books.
Triss was hardly in the second game as well. I'd say there was about as much of Triss in the Witcher 3 as there was in the Witcher 2. Which is pretty damn generous when you consider the fact that she is pretty much a tertiary character in the books.
---------- Updated at 05:33 PM ----------
They probably ran out of development time. If not that then they didn't think it was good enough to be in the game.
Its not generous at all, Triss has been the most important character in the first two games apart from Geralt
The books don't count, it doesn't matter that she was a teritary character there
How so?She really wasn't that important in TW2.It was more about Roche/Iorveth.
Just like TW3 is more about Ciri?
The whole game didn't revolve around her (same with TW1) sure but it doesn't need to, she was still a very important character
Oh,God.Don't remind about TW1 Triss.She was an abomination.
I think Triss also has a much better role in TW3.She is actually useful and has some character development.In TW2 Triss is just a love interest and a damsel in distress.