true, but i felt TW2 had a better "antagonist", compared to the wild hunt which are BARELY in 3rd the game v_v
However 3 had a more diverse cast of Villains in general, along with an internal struggle between Geralt and destiny which has been a massive part of the narrative of the whole series since 'Sword of Destiny' - The Witcher 3 is a much more faithful game in terms of how it portrays the characters and in its worldbuilding.
You also have stellar characters, such as the Baron which are created so damn well, he almost feels real, people really don't give him enough mention - He's a PTSD and drink fueled, broken man who hides behind a wall of alcohol and wit to try and keep his problems at bay and it consistently comes back to him - which in the end may cause his undoing, gah, he's so well crafted.
As for TW2, its antagonist really is not present, Letho is a tool of Emhyr and while Geralt and Emhyr aren't going to be friends at any point it isn't as if Geralt is going to hunt down Emhyr and kill him for it, Letho was spared in my game - Once Emhyr invades its perfectly clear who was behind the murder of Foltest and Demavend.
never before in a game have I seen such incredible looking armor, I mean every set just looks spectacular, especially the dark mode set, which r the best I have ever seen in a game, though some did share a similar model. From the ban ard armor to the thyssen armor just magnificent.
While I dunno who designed the majority of the armor in the witcher 3, cuz they need to be fired. If it's not broke why fix it. Other than the kae mohren set and the feline and ursine. Everything looks like a jesters costume, or makes geralt look like he has a beer belly
The armor in the Witcher 3 is heavily based on real armor however:
If it isn't curved in such a way, it'd not deflect the swords, or claws, being swung at it, I kinda like the realistic armor - But I still only wear feline because its the best regardless.
But TW2's and TW1's armors did look cool.