It's not about them having a use. It's about having control over one's collection.There is absolutely 0 use for spare cards.
But the topic was discussed in an older News thread, and I have no interest in doing it all over again.
It's not about them having a use. It's about having control over one's collection.There is absolutely 0 use for spare cards.
There is absolutely 0 use for spare cards.
Update is LIVE!
1.5gb Download. Get on you fools!
To developer,Can't you add a provision limit to Bribery too?
Okay, so you suggest NG is not a problem because the best players in upper ranks don't have such a problem dealing with NG's wide array of control tactics.And still people whining about NG ;'D
In upper ranks, where actual skill counts, NG is so-so, a lot of ways to dominate or outsmart it.
NG lacks true engines, some decks rely on RNG (Bribery, Diplomacy, Reveal) , and it`s easily punished by other factions, if the player is at least good.
Yes, you are beginning to understand what "risk" should mean.
The risk causes some cards to be used less, that makes different types of deck, therefore also the one who plays "that bronze card" risks saving it for something that may not be used by his opponent.
Defenders should never have existed in the first place, not how they work right now.
At first glance it seems that they got out of hand, ST was quite good so far it did not need much more.
To developer,
How does it feel when your opponent have total control over your best legendary card to your bronze cards?
That's how it feel when playing against NG... they can access you ANYTIME ANYWHERE
"More like they won't grow and never let you grow. If you grow it's mine. And I'll repeat.
The developers mine as well "
My point is if your opponent plays a card that can gives high impact, eg. Bribery 8=prov can pull your 13 prov card and DEPLOY, what is the point of this so called provision? what do I get in return? misery?
Imagine ST got Bribery 8p and I pull your Damien 11p and play along my defender and use Mystic Echo over and over.What risk and downside is there to Vernossiel? Both Phillipa cards? Falibor? BB ? Anseis? Seltkirk? Vissegerd? Oak? Crowmother?
You can't tell me these cards are 'fine' because 99% of decks use them. In fact, NR and ST decks use at least 4 of these in every deck and nothing has been done about it. Disgusting.
But of course, what else would people give as example but Oak? It is a cancer and shouldn't exist in it's current form.
It's quite tiresome, to be honest. No one complains about Imperial diplomacy because it doesn't allow the opponent to play op cards. When someone gets to play one of the unbalanced cards, suddenly people start complaining.
Maybe the problem is not that the others get to play a card out of your deck but that they get to play unbalanced cards just like you? If these cards were tuned no one would complain.
What risk and downside is there to Vernossiel? Both Phillipa cards? Falibor? BB ? Anseis? Seltkirk? Vissegerd? Oak? Crowmother?
You can't tell me these cards are 'fine' because 99% of decks use them. In fact, NR and ST decks use at least 4 of these in every deck and nothing has been done about it. Disgusting.
Nilfgaard barely has any decent engines to start with hence the reason lock/seize and tactic/assimilate are prevalent in the metaSome NG do play their engine decks and defenders but very rare. Maybe they find it fun playing other faction cards...