- Status
I would ask differently - What features are actually cut from game that would make game better??? because so far, everybody mentions features that just dont really make sense to be in the game in the first place, or just create a ton of other issues and therefore its quite understandable why they were cut off... so which features are we talking about???
Delusion is the right word.
They really think they actually delivered a 9/10 game on PC? Gameplay as it stands feels at least like a 10+ years old game, a good one maybe but a very limited one, like the very first Assassin's Creed games (which I don't really like, played the first two though, and at the time, for the time, they where OK...), but even way back then we had things like EoS MW just an example (and many others).
Do they really believe they actually delivered the next Witcher 3, honestly?
None. You're absolutely right. You single-handedly refuted every detailed analysis of missing features that would have improved the game in meanginful ways, which are incidentally too extensive to be reproduced in this comment thread for your specific convenience. The game is perfect as-is, GOTY, 10/10.
At least five times the amount of good side quests with a dozen or more very long branching side quests, main quest feels like a good side quest in any other good RPG. Quest hubs to explore with activities to do. Lore and information given via actual dialogue with important NPCs, more intrecative good NPCs to talk to too with new dialogue from time to time, reasons to actually explore the city and visit important locations (bars, restaurants, quest hubs) trough out the game again and again, etc., you know, like ab actually good RPG.
Post automatically merged:
Or this. Exactly : )
Well for instance, the traffic hasn't even the basic ability like changing lanes when facing an obstacle and the pedestrians are dumber than a rock.
Attachments
-
1610912915094.jpg
Lots of things is being claimed, and nobody actually thinks things through.. i give you one example - NANOWIRE hacking - cut from game.. BECAUSE - you can hack people REMOTELY anyway... so whats the point in connecting the wire to the victim???
Many such "features" were introduced in demo, because overall design changes and certain things become irrelevant.. like this Nanowire hacking...
Yet its easier to jump on a hate bandwagon these days, than actually think why things were removed in the first place...
Which is worse. Nanowire hacking would be better, more immersive and in tone with source material and help balance the game. Almost every single change from what is described by the narrator in the demo to what we got in the final product was a clear downgrade.
Apparently they do.
The delusion started with the Witcher 3. In a way, that game is the root of all the problems with Cyberpunk. That was the game that made CDPR think they were good at creating open worlds (they weren't) and led them to believe they could take on a project of even more ambitious scope without the proper expertise or groundwork in place.
Can you recommend to me a few of those "actually good RPGs" with all of these features you just listed?
BUT with even less content and choices and interesting side quests than Witcher3 at launch, but with even more bugs and performance problems: )
Your argument falls apart when you realize they removed features that have been reliable staples of the RPG genre for decades, because they form the literal core of the roleplay experience.
There is nothing special about watching 200 braindead NPC's cluttering my field of view. All they can do is crouch if i pull my gun out, or disappear if i turn around. Most of the time they have 5 siblings walking next to them, wich also kills some of the point about flooding the map with them. Its just empty filler. I'd much rather see 10-20npc's, where they ahve some sort of purpose and actualy respond/react to you as a player or the events that are unfolding.
And honestly, im happy for you being content with the game as is. It's just a tad bothersome, when you have to go all out trying to "debunk" those of us that expect, a certain standard for a game. That claims to be a NEXT GEN ACTION RPG mind you.
[/QUOTE]
sorry but you have pretty low standarts if you consider th
I am sorry but you have pretty low standard if you think this is a 10/10 game. I am gaming for more then 20 years and this is an average game at most It also have average reviews from the players 7/10 is pretty average in my opinion. (Valhalla has 7.6/10 and would you say its and exceptional game? )
The biggest problem there is that a 10/10 game is what was advertised, the said it would be a new standard for an open world games, as polished as RDR2 and other similar statements which are just not true.
In the end I see this game as another average open world Ubisoft kind of game only with better story, but with even worse "open world" and immersion elements that Ubi games have. Is Cyberpunk fun ? Sure but it is a 10/10 game? Absolutely not, its just another yeah good enough game which came out maybe 50 or more in past 2-3 years, and thats why I am so dissapointed, because it had so much potential and its just wasted.
sorry but you have pretty low standarts if you consider th
I would take 2-5 pedestrians with day/night cycle over 200 brain deadly walking around and despawning every time you turn a camera any time ... quality over quantity dude
I am sorry but you have pretty low standard if you think this is a 10/10 game. I am gaming for more then 20 years and this is an average game at most It also have average reviews from the players 7/10 is pretty average in my opinion. (Valhalla has 7.6/10 and would you say its and exceptional game? )
The biggest problem there is that a 10/10 game is what was advertised, the said it would be a new standard for an open world games, as polished as RDR2 and other similar statements which are just not true.
In the end I see this game as another average open world Ubisoft kind of game only with better story, but with even worse "open world" and immersion elements that Ubi games have. Is Cyberpunk fun ? Sure but it is a 10/10 game? Absolutely not, its just another yeah good enough game which came out maybe 50 or more in past 2-3 years, and thats why I am so dissapointed, because it had so much potential and its just wasted.
My denial stage was very, very short.
It lasted for some minutes during and after the epilogue, when I thought: "no. They didn't do that right?... They did not introduce at least 5 immersion contradictions and retcons?"
Then the credits riled and I advanced to stage 2.
- Status