Haahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Good one.
okay enlighten me then, what exactly is lacking here (besides old argument about Eredin which was talked about milion times. :yawn: )
1. Almost every important character was complicated. Depending on the situation they could be bad or good. Or simply grey
2. The political aspect of the game were balanced with the other parts of the game. Also, it was complicated and interesting. You need to read and pay attention carefully to understand the whole plot and complete the game.
3. The racial issue was a big part of the game. This is important because it's also important in the books.
4. Your decisions during the game mattered. Just to choose between Roche or Iorveth changed the rest of the game. In TW3 you can take decisions but you don't see the outcome
5. Your decisions were tough. You always lost something. They only similar decision in TW3 is the one you have to take in Reasons of State and the writting in that quest is the worst of the game
6 One of the most important things: CONSISTENCY. Once you met the character and you get an idea of how are their ways of thinking, they don't suddenly change and begin to behave like a totally different character (Examples: Roche, or Dijkstra, or Emhyr)
6. Sex scenes were better, which in my opinion improves the inmersion. In TW3 is like Geralt was fucking with dollies
7. Triss was an interesting woman. Clever. In TW3 is like a beatiful dolly who wants to save everyone. Just that. They put everything on Yennefer
8. They care about details. In TW3, there are things whichs seems rushed. For example, why the mages needs saving when the could create portals in order to escape? Even if just a few mages can do it, Triss definetly can. An the entire Novigrad's plot blows with that argument
9. Every character which was introduced was developed until the end. Not like the bosses of Novigrad's underworld
10. The factions in the game acted like in the books. Nilfgaard was the enemie and the Northern Kingdoms were far from the best land in the world but, in the end, the best choice. In TW3 it's seems like the North is bad and Nilfgaard the true civlization
11. The characters which were portrayed from the books were exactly the same. Same way of thinking and behave. In TW3 you can see Ciri as a totally white character. The good one. When she wasn't that way in the game
And probably more reasons will come to my mind soon but I think I've resumed pretty well the reasons. Also, I would like to ask you some respect. I think that I've been polite when I've answered to you and I don't need to laugh in the face of anyone
.
