I understand the point of the ending because the whole point is that nobody gets a truly happy ending in Night City, but the whole 'You've been in a coma for two years' is seriously contrived. Even if I can accept that, the fact that all you can do is give your love interest and friends a text message saying you'll be out of town for a few weeks is too much. Why, because Reed told you to? Why do I give a shit what he told me to do? Sure it's a matter of NUSA security and they could reneg on the deal if you gave away secure details, but at the very least any normal human being would call or visit their lover at the very least and explain that there is a cure for their condition. V is going in for experimental life altering surgery where there's no estimated recovery time and all he had to say to Panam was two lines through a text? Bullshit.
It doesn't even make sense that V would say nothing. He has been given weeks to live at most and he has told everyone he trusts this and then he is told that he could be in recovery for an indeterminate amount of time, and he doesn't even think for one second to tell ANYONE that he might not be responsive for a time for any particular reason other than 'I gotta bounce, see you later' through text? Also apparently Panam, or whomever you message doesn't even think to say 'wait, where are you going for possibly a few weeks when you told me recently that you're quickly dying.'?
I fully expected the ending to still be linked to the main story ending I.E. you have to connect to the blackwall through alt to activate the AI, or NUSA makes an agreement that you infect Alt as part of the deal, then you would still have the option of getting to the end and making your choice there and not ignoring the last quarter of the original game.
Yeah, I find this ending contrived. On its own I get it, but it seems like a ham hashed way of giving the nobody gets a happy ending message. Maybe CDPR didn't want to put in the effort of fundamentally rewriting the game ending or the writers just couldn't be bothered to do it, but it's pretty flimsy.
I saw that people were complaining about the ending before finishing it and I figured there would be some aspect that made it not a total happy ending and I honestly expected to be defending it like I did with the original ending, but nah screw that.
It isn't badly written on its own if you take it for what it is, but when you add in every external piece of other characters and your relationship to them it just doesn't chalk up to much for me.
(I'm referring to V as a he and Panam as his lover because that is how I played it, but I've seen the female V version with Judy as a lover and it is fundamentally the same.)
EDIT: As an afterthought, If you don't have a love interest in the game maybe it is a little less contrived but I still don't buy that V wouldn't say anything to anyone other than a bunch of texts saying he'd be out of town. Also I am ignoring the fact that just as an afterthought they shunted in that Johnny gets wiped and its only stated optionally in a call to Reed, which doesn't really make sense to me, surely the Relic would still have data on it. You could argue that the NUSA wouldn't want a known Anticapitalist terrorist alive so would wipe the chip, or at least part of the deal would be that the NUSA keeps the chip to use for their own research, which I would accept as a premise, but they didn't do that, they just gave a bullshit handwave of Johnny has to die for reasons as a fake excuse to give you a moral dilemma about going through with it if you like Johnny.
Exactly they went out of their way to create an other bad ending, its contrived bad writing, as simple as that.