That's YOUR opinion. And it's valid FOR YOU. But you need to accept that for others, TPP is what provides the best immersion.
- Status
That's YOUR opinion. And it's valid FOR YOU. But you need to accept that for others, TPP is what provides the best immersion.
You can argue that an internet poll isn't valid because it's not getting a true representative sample. Internet polls in particular are subject to sample bias because they're "opt in". It's entirely possible that the people who are happy with the choice are underrepresented because they have no reason to be in the thread complaining. You can also argue that the sample size of this poll simply isn't large enough.
Those are both fair and valid points.
But there's literally no proof that the people who prefer TPP in Cyberpunk 2077 (not talking about the gaming industry in general) are the "vocal minority".
If anything the available evidence suggests that the FPP folks are the ones in the minority.
i don't like 1st person view, it is not immersive for me, the best choice would be the oportunity to choose FPV or TPV and play your adventure as you want, well, thats my opinion. Anyway congratulations cdpr for the amazing trailer and for the game i will play it for sure if i can. Maybe in pc, modders can do something with the perspective or cdpr change his decision. And sorry for my English.
They can leave combat in FPS, but normal walking around should be in TPS. i can not play this game if its only FPS. i get sick about 10-20mins after Playing FPS
I'm not touching EA games even with a stick. EA is the cancer of this planet and CDPR is... the cure.I agree, the same thing I wrote on the DICE forum, immediately after the release of Battlefront 2...
Now this is finally an optimistic comment. Indeed this can be changed in upcoming patches etc. Lets not force the game to be in delay even more, just because of this 1st person thing.
Do you not understand the concept of motion sickness? obviously not
Nobody here complains that there will be awful gameplay, people just want to see their characters...
It won't happen.
Just like the EA guys haven't fixed the goddamned absence of facial animations in Andromeda after release.
If TPP has to be done, it has to be done as soon as possible, before releasing.
My two cents.
I am sorry to say this but then it's a no buy for you. Not all the people can be made happy when a game is developed. As stated before, they can add 3rd person through a later patch.
Look at how many changes been done to Witcher 3 through the patches.
Hmm - How do you know these cut scenes are only occasional? Do not forget that the dialogue is in 3th person also!
We are talking about an RPG here!. That means lots of cut scenes, and lots of dialogue. It's the "bread and butter" of RPG's! It's "only" the fighting/walking (and stealth and crawling trough "whatever they designed") that is in first person. You will see your character even more often in 3th person than you could imagine now. That's what I predict.
Actually, yes, they have confirmed working mirrors. They've stated that we'll be able to see our character in reflected in mirrors and, IIRC, some screens/environmental conditions (I'm guessing water).
Idk looks like Rockstar and Bethesda seem to accommodate all their Fans. But CDPR had to alienate half? makes no sense to me. I thought they wanted to be more like Rockstar? seems they wanted to be more like Disney.
Why is this so difficult for some people to understand?:
-We know the game will be mostly in first person
-We know what first person perspective plays like
-We know what first person perspective feels like
-We've played first person games before
Honestly, I have no idea how the whole "you have to see/try it first in order to judge it" argument seems even remotely relevant here.
Oh come on, people, stop with hyperbole and drama already! Jeez... "half their fans"... CDPR is the new EA, we are all DOOOOMED!
@InsomniumX It's still true, though... especially FPP games can have a wildly different feel to them, so we really can't know how it will play until we see it.
You realize when rockstar added first person they did it in an entirely new version of the game? That took 2 years to develop? And Bethesda animations are half assed, it's not hard for them to add both. CDPR has a higher standard
IMHO nothing suits this kind of game better than the first person view.
Adding a third person view would mean TON of rework on every single animation, the proportions, the gunplay and fight mechanics, the interactions with every object, etc.
There is proof indeed. No one is baiting an eye about FPP but some people. It's a vocal minority if you think that millions want to play this game and only a couple of thousands are asking for TPP.
Adding a third person view would mean TON of rework on every single animation, the proportions, the gunplay and fight mechanics, the interactions with every object, etc.
There is proof indeed. No one is baiting an eye about FPP but some people. It's a vocal minority if you think that millions want to play this game and only a couple of thousands are asking for TPP.
Have you not played witcher? you can spend days without seeing a cutscene specially if your exploring. Witcher has what 14 hours of cutscenes? but 300 hours of gameplay? now implemenet that to cyberpunk. that means you would only get too see or enjoy your character customization about less than 1% of the time.
- Status