Don't tell me you are now going to found the "Let's bake Emhyr a cookie" club! Weren't you the guy that hated Emhyr? Be still, my beating heart!;D
Gentle teasing aside, yes, he is awesome and would be sorely missed. But I would have prefered a bigger commitment to his character.
Last edited:
I like Darth Vader, Doctor Doom, Tywin Lannister, and Saruman too!
I just think they should be stabbed repeatedly.
I sided with Dijkstra 50% just because my Geralt thought Nilfgaard winning the war would lead to Emhyr coming after Ciri.
I think he should be the villain in Witcher 4 if they can get Charles Dance to commit to the role.
Hell, if they can't, but that would be a big step down.
I agree with op.
I don't know why they did that. I only got the witcher ending and was very sattisfied with that choice. I thought it was the best one. Why would Ciri ever want to become empress? **** that
I personally ( could be wrong ) figured they did it to show more of how the events affected them. To show how Ciri felt about it, emotionally. Just the same as the "Bad" ending where it showed how hard Ciri's "death" affected Geralt. Whereas the ending where Ciri becomes a witcher, it isn't that hard to know how they both feel about the outcome, considering the last couple hours of the game.
Though that is just my take, and i am no expert
A Witcher 4 will be just like ME4 (and don't call it ME4
Eh, it'll be about Ciri then. The Dragon Age and ME games are bout the world.
The Witcher games are about the Characters.
A Witcher 4 will be just like ME4 (and don't call it ME4). There will be another witcher game but it won't be about Shepard err Geralt.
MWFE
Mass Witcher Fallout Effect
Story - Ciri tried a new bomb recipe she got from "The World with Men with metal on their heads"....But the Effect was a little bit too much....
But hey, the Ghoulnest is gone.....
Comming - when its ready.....
Last edited:
ME was about Shepard. Even they said that. But using your logic TW1-3 can be about witchers then. And DA was about bad games.
As far as I know, the Wild Hunt doesn't "use" the real White Frost, but it uses the "cold" that surrounds them when travelling from world to world. I think Yennefer mentions this to Triss (missable dialogue) after Ciri arrives at Kaer Morhen.
Assuming different worlds are just other planets in the galaxy/universe this would make sense as the space is quite cold.
Well, humans arrived just 500 years ago and there were quite some incidents before the first witchers were created.
ME was about Shepard. Even they said that. But using your logic TW1-3 can be about witchers then. And DA was about bad games.
I have to agree with Willow even though I find this conversation pointless.
ME1,2,3+DAO+DAI are about the world, which is the protagonist. All actions by the player/main chars strive towards a global goal.
Also they are also exercises in world-building from a writing standpoint.
Witcher 1+2 (even 3) are not like that, they're much more intimate nd personal journeys where world is
On the lore side of things, worldbuilding is limited as they take place in a breathing, dynamic, pre-existing universe.
DA:2 I don't know what that is.
---------- Updated at 07:34 PM ----------
I was under the impression they arrived 1300 years ago first, with the conjunction of the spheres?
If that's the case and not only human kingdoms and cities are that recent, but also Witchers, etc. the entire Sapkowski mythos is rubbish.
Last edited:
Gerald01 said:
No, the elves arrived at that time, but the books indicate the humans came to this world because of the conjuntion. The conjunction of the spheres occured 1500 years ago.
It's likey humans lived on another continent before. They just arrived at the current continent 500 years ago by using ships.
Why?
Last edited:
Maybe you guys should go tell Bioware/EA that they are therefore wrong in their marketing and descriptions.
In every review I've ever read Shepard is the protagonist, not the world. BTW all I said about DA was that they were bad games.
Here is a detailed history of humans on this continent: http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Human
And here is an overall timeline: http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline
And here is an overall timeline: http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline
Maybe you should tell all the people who loved and enjoyed the games that they should know better and should think that they are bad, aswell as all the reviewers.
First off I only said the DA games were bad. The first one was the best. DA 2 stunk. DA:I is slightly better. The metascores of all reviews are:
DA:O 91 (TW3 has a 94)
DA:I 85
DA:2 82
User scores are:
DA:O 8.6 (TW3 for comparrison has a 9.2)
DA:2 4.4 (means it sucked)
DA:I 5.8
So the first one was decent but the second sucked and the last one was only a little better. So I don't have to tell the reviewers anything. People and reviewers have already spoken.
those are pretty good scores, does it have to be 90+ to be in not-suck category? Did you even play the games or you just running a weird calculation in your head based on metacritic scores? DA:I has low user score because you are looking at PC version and PC version suffered slightly, which was improved. For some people shortcomings in PC controls was a bigger deal than for others who enjoyed the game for its merits. People and reviewers have spoken for the fact that DAI was GOTY last year. This year its very likely Fallout 4 will take the spot.
As for DA2, well it was much worse than DA:O and had many flaws, but still enjoyable.
Last edited:
But is she safer as Empress or as a Witcher,is she safe at all as empress, here is known facts:
No Witcher has ever died in his own bed - here is why : Serrit, Auckers, Letho all killed by Geralt of Rivia, Coen died fighting nilfgard, Berengar killed by Geralt or Azar Javed, Vesemir killed by Wild Hunt and then Geralt dismembered that Wild Hunt, so i think she is pretty much safe as witcher with Geralt
Now same rule goes to kings - No King has ever died in his own bed - list is much longer - Eist Tuirseach, Calanthe, Foltest, Demavend all dead because of nilfgard some of them killed by assasination ordered by Emhyr, Vezimir, Demavend and Radovid killed because of Philippa all three assasinated, Henselt, Crach an Craite, King Bran all dead, Esterad Thyssen - killed by assasins, so is she even any safer on nilfgardian throne than with Geralt, is she even safe with Phillipa and Emhyr.
She risk her life more as Empress than as Witcher
Last edited: