You don't actually kill him, you "kill" his spectral form.
Ok thank you for the answer. Have one more question- what happens with Triss and Geralt in the book at the end?
You don't actually kill him, you "kill" his spectral form.
Ok thank you for the answer. Have one more question- what happens with Triss and Geralt in the book at the end?
Well, she end up with Eskel...At least unofficialyWell I care for Shani btw :b Well I ask about Triss cause Im confused he end up with Yennefer in the end but what happened to Triss then...
Ok thank you for the answer. Have one more question- what happens with Triss and Geralt in the book at the end?
The game is not Witcher 2 Expansion Pack; it is Witcher 3, and it has to be substantially complete and stand on it own no matter what conditions may come from the previous game. There can't be an imported decision that cuts off any quest line or even a substantial part of a quest.
I disagree and I don't think it would affect much into main story line. Most of the important choices in witcher 2 was political and in witcher 3 political/millitary stuff is secondary content: "If we want we can impact it". So changes in those areas shouldn't conflict with "game's standing on its own" issue.
I just hope Witch hunt will continue in W3, because that's was my canon and also most favourite ending of W2! The Massacare of Loc Muinne!
CDPR got you covered! In 35 min. demo you can see at least 2 groups of witch hunters in Novigrad.
What do they say?
I just hope Witch hunt will continue in W3, because that's was my canon and also most favourite ending of W2! The Massacare of Loc Muinne!
I mean this sh*t was brutal!
Personally, I hope the choices from the first two games don't impact TW3 too much.
I don't want to have to replay the TW2 to get a complete experience of TW3.
And I hope that they will matter, especially those from finale in Loc Muinne where your choices will decide the fate of mages.
Disappointed to read in a recent interview that Witcher 1 choices will be ignored.