Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!Aver said:I'm more excited about Cyberpunk than about TW3!
Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!Aver said:I'm more excited about Cyberpunk than about TW3!
I don't care about guns, but I care about awesome dystopian world. Also there is way to many fantasy RPGs. It will be something fresh.Rock4one said:Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!
So any game that has guns is just like Call of Duty? Mass Effect, Max Payne, Deus Ex, Resident Evil, etc.. It doesn't matter what the rest of the game is about, what kind of game design they have, or how the combat mechanics actually work, they're basically like playing Call of Duty?Rock4one said:Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!
It definitely looked like it.guipit said:is that a filipino guy saying "salamat"? that's cool. I wonder what his job is there.
(Resists urge to say "Incentive to apply for a job?" )guipit said:How did you animated sex scenes? Was that mo cap? Is there video material of this mo cap in progress?
Maybe you are new around the gaming scene, but Call Of Duty was not the first FPS around here, so you maybe need to rephrase that to Wolfenstein 3D, and that's still not truthful enoughRock4one said:Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!
TW 2 Enhanced edition was just released for a platform CD RED have never done before. It also took several years after TW 1 Enhanced edition before we actually knew TW 2 would come to any platform. I understand your concerns but you really should be more patient. TW 3 is most likely still in the planning section and they of course have to work alot with that before they actually have any valid information to release to the community. Rest assure TW 3 will come, that we are almost 100% certain of and can you really blame a company who wants to try something new? If not, then you could say that the xbox release wasn't necessary at all.sandisrd said:So where is big announcement? Where is epic The witcher 3 announcement?....Instead of TW realistic franchise we get some crappy weird RPG ''cyberpunk''!!!, so what next Mario with RPG elements!!!.
Come on!, company like CDPR building such a big fan base because of TW realistic franchise presents now this childish (Deus ex style) game, biggest disappointment, truly biggest from CDPR!, well reason for that is because this company was last hope for video game industry mature players.....![]()
Not exactly. Fallouts are post-apocalyptic RPGs, not cyberpunk. Those two settings usually do share dystopian atmosphere and the themes of destruction and decay as well as many others, commonly associated with sci-fi. However, cyberpunk focuses on the corruption and degeneration before the armageddon, while with post-apoc it's obviously the other way round. Also cyberpunk favours urban settings.Pangaea said:Don't think I've ever played a cyberpunk game, but have bought Fallout 1 and 2 so maybe those fit into the category.
I would say they are still far from the RPG makers of the old, but they try. I hope that this new RPG will let us shape the character's personality on more profound levels, and finally have some other skills than combat-related with C&C built around them. The last thing we need is aIt's great CDPR are growing another foot to stand on, while they also focus on their bread and butter so to speak with The Witcher games. They're perhaps the only game developer I trust right now, so I have good faith they'll make another great game. As long as they stick to a mature world with tough choices and real(ish) consequences they'll have another winner. Whether we use guns, swords, arrows or dickwaving isn't the main issue. What matters is the quality of the story and the professionality of the game.
You really have no idea what a role-playing game is, or where "role-playing" video games come from, do you?sandisrd said:From epic The witcher to big joke PAPER & PEN RPG!!, are you kidding me....
PS: If you really want you can even make Mario mature....
Hopefully not. I'd like an RPG, not a shooter with superficial RPG elements.sandisrd said:It's not going to be pen and paper seniore derp. It's most likely going to end up being somewhat similar to Deus Ex.
*sigh*sandisrd said:That is till to be argue, but apart from that looks like nothing special than Deus ex, maybe more mature....
Thankfully others already replied. I'll do it anyway. First, guns and first-person shooters do not necessarily go together (Fallout being an excellent example). Second, every shooter goes back to Wolfenstein 3D. But I understand that *you* would go back to CoD, since it's easily one of the most widespread games now.sandisrd said:Not me...If I wanted to play a game using guns I would go back to Call of Duty!
Exactly my thoughts. Unlike what others said, there aren't any real futuristic RPG's out there now, I would barely consider Mass Effect 1 an RPG and definitely not the 3rd. Same with Deus Ex, which is a hybrid. Even The Witcher 2 doesn't have much in the ways of customizing your character beyond combat-related abilities. Of course, The Witcher's universe doesn't really encourage you to be diplomatic with monsters, although you *can* be in certain occasions (as with Troll Trouble).sandisrd said:I would say they are still far from the RPG makers of the old, but they try. I hope that this new RPG will let us shape the character's personality on more profound levels, and finally have some other skills than combat-related with C&C built around them. The last thing we need is aroll-playing gamepopamole shooter with stats that poses as old-school, hardcore RPG.
(...) What we want to create is a graphically rich, 2D, tactical turn-based adventure, with highly contextual gameplay (...).
(...) To us a role-playing game has three things: it's got a great story with fascinating characters whose motivations actually make sense, it's got a fun world to explore, and it's got character development options which as you expand and develop your characters actually open up new gameplay opportunities. (...)
Exactly. The character progression in TW2 makes it look like a pretty good action-adventure with stats, and not an RPG.Volsung said:Exactly my thoughts. Unlike what others said, there aren't any real futuristic RPG's out there now, I would barely consider Mass Effect 1 an RPG and definitely not the 3rd. Same with Deus Ex, which is a hybrid. Even The Witcher 2 doesn't have much in the ways of customizing your character beyond combat-related abilities.
Actually, this is the common misconception which serves as an argument against any other gameplay styles in the franchise. If one analysed the novels closely, it would turn out that Geralt fights rarely; he is more eager to avoid it through various means. Only a handful of short stories are about him fighting creatures - more are about finding alternative or peaceful solutions to supernatural problems. So why must the gameplay in TW series restrict Geralt and all his skills just to combat? It is fairly easy to come up with peaceful or semi-peaceful means of solving a quest through the use of alchemy, magic and even swordsmanship.Of course, The Witcher's universe doesn't really encourage you to be diplomatic with monsters, although you *can* be in certain occasions (as with Troll Trouble).
Yeah I did. Sounds promising, though I've never been a great fan of Shadowrun. Wasteland 2, on the other hand...Have you read the description of Shadowrun Returns? That sounds promising. I hope CD Projekt can take a similar direction, of course with their own, unique touch.
Oops my mistake, I meant the Witcher games, not the universe itself (which would include the saga). You are right.Mrowakus said:Actually, this is the common misconception which serves as an argument against any other gameplay styles in the franchise. If one analysed the novels closely, it would turn out that Geralt fights rarely; he is more eager to avoid it through various means. Only a handful of short stories are about him fighting creatures - more are about finding alternative or peaceful solutions to supernatural problems. So why must the gameplay in TW series restrict Geralt and all his skills just to combat? It is fairly easy to come up with peaceful or semi-peaceful means of solving a quest through the use of alchemy, magic and even swordsmanship.