I love Phil in a books and in the games REDs did a good job with her character. Loved every minute with her in games. Is's a shame other sorceresses from Lodge did not received good treatment, eh. Love them all to bits.
I liked Philippa in the books and and in W2, despite her betrayal. I didn't like that she was so openly aggressive and dismissive of Geralt in W3 though.
Not because I think Geralt simply has the right to be treated better by her (for examply since my Geralt saved her life at least two time now), but because I think it's stupid behaviour of her to alienate someone like Geralt so openly for no reason at all. (Hmm okay maybe she is secretely in love with Geralt and hates him for sleeping around with all the other sorceresses? Would be the only logical explanation for me for her behaviour. )
But well for a supposedly intelligent and wise sorceress she made a quite immature and short shighted impression on me in her conversations with Geralt. Personally I would have expected her to learn from her mistakes in W2. She afterall is one of the main reason for the death of countless of her "sisters". That she obviously didn't learn anything from that mistakes and shows no sign of self criticism was one of the only very few negative aspects of W3. Hoping now we might see a wiser version of her in a possible expansion.
Isn't Phillipa's primary character trait in the games she's not nearly as wise as she thinks she is, or, at all? It's kind of her (to quote Lancelot), "idiom" that she thinks she's a Master Manipulator but everyone fools her.
And she thinks she's a genius, when all of her plans blow up in her face.
And that she's incredibly charismatic but, in fact, alienates everyone she meets. Hell, in Witcher 2, she thinks Radovid loves her as a mother.
But well for a supposedly intelligent and wise sorceress she made a quite immature and short shighted impression on me in her conversations with Geralt. Personally I would have expected her to learn from her mistakes in W2. She afterall is one of the main reason for the death of countless of her "sisters". That she obviously didn't learn anything from that mistakes and shows no sign of self criticism was one of the only very few negative aspects of W3. Hoping now we might see a wiser version of her in a possible expansion.
Isn't Phillipa's primary character trait in the games she's not nearly as wise as she thinks she is, or, at all? It's kind of her (to quote Lancelot), "idiom" that she thinks she's a Master Manipulator but everyone fools her.
And she thinks she's a genius, when all of her plans blow up in her face.
And that she's incredibly charismatic but, in fact, alienates everyone she meets. Hell, in Witcher 2, she thinks Radovid loves her as a mother.
Well true in the end it turns out like that, but nobody seems to call her out on that. Also in the books in her first meeting with Geralt she acts way smarter and smoother. Even shows a liking in Geralt's personality. In W2 she acts less smoother but still gives the impression to think things through and have good self control.
What I really don't get is that her reaction to her failures in W2 is to become more arrogant, short sighted in her decisions and alienating towards possible and trustworthy allies. There seems to be no learning effect for her, which is kinda strange for such powerful and formerly clever sorceress. So for me Phillippa in W3 is just a sorry, disappointing shell of what she could or maybe even should have been.
To be fair, humility would ruin her character.
I loved when Geralt shot her down during that conversation. That was great snark.
No, even GERALT, famous lover of sorceresses wouldn't touch Phillipa with a ten foot pole.
I'll pass on seeing her humble -- her arrogance is because of her past success.
Radovid spent most of his life firmly under her thumb -- clearly a success, even if she lost control later on.
Formed a secret society to replace the former open one -- which removed most of her competition.
Killed and subverted monarchs in order to gain control over their territory.
Her enemies who were admitted to The Lodge, most importantly Yennefer and Enid an Gleanna -- were systematically put under her influence.
Philippa always doubles down, that's why so many seem to think she fails.
The reality is she has one end goal.
Its path may be calculated and subtle, but make no mistake; she'd rather fail at world domination than be the de facto ruler of some small-time Northern kindgom.
She's always on the winning side, or the one she thinks she can best manipulate.
Now, with all of the Phil hate broiling about on here, there must be some of you who don't despise the wise old owl...or at least find her character fascinating.
What are your thoughts on her portrayal in TW3? What you liked, that which you did not, and of course, where you're still confused about what she's plotting.
Let's hear it.
Of course she`s fascinating. Also a total bitch. She`s one of the characters I can`t get over with after what she did to Saskia, the only actually good (personality) character in the whole universe