You're not being honest here. I'm on this forum for a long time and I have good memory. You previously said that your rationale was to damage the northern kingdoms as much as possible. You were playing not Geralt but Letho #2.Yep, that was rationale for letting her die as well. All this talk about common good, better Aedirn and stuff, but when she was exposed, and shit hits a fan, in order to save her own skin and eliminate every witness, she unleashed a dragon to kill EVERYONE in LM, including John Natalis, Anais, etc.
You're mistaken about Sile's "unleashing a dragon". Philippa controls the dragon, not Sile. Sile says that the dragon will kill everyone but that's just her angry words because it's very far from truth. Saskia is not a dummy on the remote control, she makes her own decisions but values Philippa's opinion the most, she's magically in love with Philippa. Therefore, the spell didn't make her a cold-blooded murderer. Saskia will defend Sile but she wouldn't go on murderous rampage beyond necessity and I don't think Philippa gave her instructions to kill'em all, that would be stupid and out of character. Sile was attacked and defended herself, therefore she has the same right to slaughter some knights of the order and some soldiers as Geralt has a right to slaughter arrogant villagers who decided to attack him in the tavern. They should have known better.
Sile indeed participated in a plot to assassinate Demavend but was accused in the plot to murder all northern kings. She was framed by Nilfgaardian spies. Considering your Geralt killed Henselt, accusing Sile in murder as Geralt character is hypocrisy.
---------- Updated at 09:34 PM ----------
Sorceresses are no better or worse than kings or the emperor. They have their agenda, they are not saints. The witcher universe doesn't have virtuous knights in the shining armor types of characters.Sorry, but this is unforgivable, and pretty much shows that the sorceresses were out only for themselves.