The only big con I can find in HC is the smaller numbers when it comes to card's strength.
The only big con is that HC has no players. So everything else doesn't matter much.
The only big con I can find in HC is the smaller numbers when it comes to card's strength.
The only big con is that HC has no players. So everything else doesn't matter much.
Meh, I don't know. We don't have any real numbers, but I never had much problems to get a quick match in ranked.
Good one, I laughed^^HC is so much better than old gwent was.
Yes, it has it's flaws, but overall it's so cool! Almost every single aspect is so much better than it was before.
You're complaining about tutors. You have enough of it now. It costs alot, but if you want consistency, you need to sacrifice power.
10 cards max and 3 every round is an epic idea. Gives the flexibility and at the same time, doesn't let you to drypass, unless you have best hand.
You are complaining about Sihil? It can be countered by artifact removal.
Different amount of mulligans is great, provisions is awesome.
The only big con I can find in HC is the smaller numbers when it comes to card's strength.
Old gwent was really average game - even thought I spent few hundreds of hours on it.
New gwent is great. And it will be even better after patches.
You should never spend money in games like this. People that do, make the game what it is now (in respect to ppl having OP decks due to paying money to get better cards) and not enjoyable for those of us who simply refuse to spend real money for pixels. I'm not disrespecting you as a person, but you have to realise why paying real money in games is a trend we should be avoiding, not embracingI really wan to say goodbye here and somehow express my thoughts.
I have been with GWENT from server test, even from first hours of closed beta. I played 600 hours of Gwent, I spent 200€ on ingame items, I spent so much time on Youtube and Twitch watching streamers, great people like swim, MegaMogwai, crokeyz, Merchant, and more - and Iam sincerly sorry I cant name you all, but you all are great.
Bye.
Well, thats not true. It had much more potenial for variance and depth, because of Gold/Silver/Bronzelimitation, many rows, a totally different victory condition than all other card games (no HP) und much more differnces in the details. So mono-focusing at one point ist the wrong way i think.Take that away and then there is no more reason to play Gwent over something like Magic or Hearthstone, it simply is a worse game in almost every aspect
Funny then that I play everday and get matches within 10-30 seconds ? I guess they are all bots?The only big con is that HC has no players. So everything else doesn't matter much.
[...] although I do get overpowered by pay to win decks [...]
The simple fact is you don't like change, and most of us don't. But if you actually gave it a fair go, which I'm sure you didn't based on your post, you would see that the entire game is a better version than its predecessor.
Oh dear, now you made me remember all the Vodka...I've always find this type of argument amusing. It always reminds me when I started going out at night with my group of friends, peer-pressuring me to try and like alcohol and tobacco. I tried once, didn't liked. Tried twice, kept disliking. Tried trice, same. What is the point of keep trying to like something that you dont like? Forcing until you like it?
lul, how is this abomination better, all arhetypes were removed, silvers removed, trios removed, provisions i think are very stupid and uselessYou should never spend money in games like this. People that do, make the game what it is now (in respect to ppl having OP decks due to paying money to get better cards) and not enjoyable for those of us who simply refuse to spend real money for pixels. I'm not disrespecting you as a person, but you have to realise why paying real money in games is a trend we should be avoiding, not embracing
As for the game, it's far better than it was during beta. More polished, far more balanced and far more enjoyable. Even though I haven't spent any money, correction, I did buy the starter pack, but other than that nothing, anyway I can still win games just by wit alone, although I do get overpowered by pay to win decks frequently (again something that has been embraced due to people like yourself showing the devs you're willing to spend ridiculous amounts of money for in-game items). But again, it's your choice, but alas most games are going in this direction and one day we won't be able to do anything without paying to play, and I don't mean buy a game, I mean like pay to have a save file (something that's already been done). In future please avoid doing that. Though I fear that this falls on deaf ears as generally those with money to spare on micro transactions have more money than sense.
The simple fact is you don't like change, and most of us don't. But if you actually gave it a fair go, which I'm sure you didn't based on your post, you would see that the entire game is a better version than its predecessor
lul, how is this abomination better, all arhetypes were removed, silvers removed, trios removed, provisions i think are very stupid and useless
yeah cdpr says poet is now high cost but it would been more easy just to nerf it by 1point in beta
more.... weather is trash, 8points low tempo, jesus..... i better play spears....
I've always find this type of argument amusing. It always reminds me when I started going out at night with my group of friends, peer-pressuring me to try and like alcohol and tobacco. I tried once, didn't liked. Tried twice, kept disliking. Tried trice, same. What is the point of keep trying to like something that you dont like? Forcing until you like it?
We've seen that excuse being toss around everything Google or Facebook changes things. "It is WAY better now, ppl are always afraid of changes" and so on. Like all these changes are actually for the best. Most of the times, such in these cases, people just swallow it and endure it because they have no other choice. Eventually some add-in or mod fixes things back. In the case of "Gwent" people just left because we do have a choice: not playing and voicing our opinion towards what they've done with the game.
No, they're not actually. Yes netdecking is a problem, but so is paying to have a card advantage. It's not very easy to earn kegs etc now, compared to in the beta. Not everyone has 12 hours a day to dedicate to playing the game if they don't want to spend money. So yes, it's netdecking AND P2W.Money doesn't equal skill and decks are pretty cheap to make to begin with, especially because of the full scrap refund at the start of Homecoming. The point is, your argument isn't about pay to win, but rather about netdecks.
HC is so much better than old gwent was. [...]
[...] it's far better than it was during beta [..]
Well.. I could tell you why I think it's better but it's obvious you prefer the old one, so I'd be talking to a wall right? People dislike change. That is all.
I bought TB five days ago and it does not work correctly on my gtx 1060. In every reinstall, I get a black screen intro or problems with starting up. I have sent them dxdiag and msinfo, and I am waiting. How much ignoring the player by cdprojekt can be tolerated?