I believe so. There is actually a toggle for it in the in-game settings, so no modding required.
I believe so. There is actually a toggle for it in the in-game settings, so no modding required.
Can you proof that? Because I think they took the hard sharpening completly out. Can you maybe link a screenshot or a video?
http://cdn2.gamepur.com/images/feature/witcher-3-pc-ultra-options-3.pngCan you proof that? Because I think they took the hard sharpening completly out. Can you maybe link a screenshot or a video?
Edit: This is from the IGN live play through a couple days ago.
Can you proof that? Because I think they took the hard sharpening completly out. Can you maybe link a screenshot or a video?
http://cdn2.gamepur.com/images/feature/witcher-3-pc-ultra-options-3.png
This screenshot was taken from the IGN stream. A dev from CDPR stated, that the sharpening is still in the game, but it's softer, because the "old sharpening" wasn't good in movement. For the game and for the player. I don't find the statement at the moment.
Its in one of the recent IGN video's, they go into the menu, sharpening option was set to off, same with AA, HBAO, Hairworks etcCan you proof that? Because I think they took the hard sharpening completly out. Can you maybe link a screenshot or a video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoIgXaYawAw&list=PLAS0D6rsAWYZ7Hffn7VX8KUZJOjwuWOZC&index=17
So hairworks uses PhysX correct? Because I'm thinking of just popping in my old 770 and using it as a dedicated PhysX card for this game.
Not sure if really neccessary, but yes. It should be no problem.
That's a bad idea, because Hairworks uses DirectCompute and not PhysX. The reason being is that there is very little simulation going on for the hair and fur that demands a more robust GPGPU API like CUDA or OpenCL. And since DirectCompute is a component of DX11 (which is already used for rendering), it's actually faster to use DirectCompute which is native to DX11, rather than CUDA or OpenCL which are non native and would require context switching.
All PhysX in the game will be calculated on the CPU, and this is a good thing. CPU PhysX has improved by leaps and bounds over the years, where it's actually really good now and can offer similar high end effects that were exclusive to GPU PhysX years ago.
---------- Updated at 02:38 AM ----------
I'm pretty sure you can't, for reasons that I mentioned in my reply to ModelsOfBoats. Since there is no context switching involved with Hairworks, you can't offload it to another GPU that isn't rendering..
The 35 min demo never had sharpen, just like SOD didnt have it, and all footge since E3 2014. Sharpen is part of the look in VGX and 2013 material.
Can you proof that? Because I think they took the hard sharpening completly out. Can you maybe link a screenshot or a video?
You can achieve a very similar sharpening using post processing injectors like SweetFX (LumaSharpen) or Benzenzimmern recently said that with RedKit you can change environment to get the same sharpening back.
http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/30086-The-Witcher-3-Modding?p=1662536&viewfull=1#post1662536
Sorry im a noob what should i look for then to have those nice looking graphics when we get the game?
This
http://reshade.me/
and presets from here
https://sfx.thelazy.net/games/ (The game should be TW3). Presets will come as the game is released.
You can make your own preset too though that takes a bit of time in understanding things.
Here is one example of what can be done with these by just a simple preset.
https://sfx.thelazy.net/games/screenshot/711/full/
Wow man this is fucking Awesome do i need a lot more power on my PC to be able to have these changes? i only have a i7 2600K 3.4GHz 8GB Ram and a GTX 960
Also which version should i download Reshade+Framework or Reshade+SweetFx 2.0?
Last edited:
Get the Framework, it comes with a variety of other shaders beside SweetFX 1.5 (like GemFX). The other download comes with Beta SweetFX 2.0 which I haven't tried that much.
No I don't think you need a monster system to do some post processing, however some effects do have performance hit and if you try to do AA through this then it will have bigger hit.
Get the Framework like I mentioned above or if you want to try SweetFX Beta 2.0 then get that one, I haven't tried it that much myself as SweetFX 1.5 does the job pretty well
Better install Framework (DOF, many lighting effects etc.) - http://steamcommunity.com/app/292030/discussions/0/617335934150599320/
downgrading the graphics even further
A question - everybody seem to be thinking about increasing the graphics quality. Unfortunately, my problem is exactly the opposite - my fps drops occasionally to 21-22 (gtx660m), which strains my eyes and negates the advantages of the combat system.
Is there a way to tweak the graphics to go "below low"? I don't really need to see the grass, I can live with trees or houses appearing nearer than now? I would be very obliged for any suggestions.
A question - everybody seem to be thinking about increasing the graphics quality. Unfortunately, my problem is exactly the opposite - my fps drops occasionally to 21-22 (gtx660m), which strains my eyes and negates the advantages of the combat system.
Is there a way to tweak the graphics to go "below low"? I don't really need to see the grass, I can live with trees or houses appearing nearer than now? I would be very obliged for any suggestions.