I had a similar question. It seems something as janky as a Shupe challenge would have been great for making casual the more fun of the two classic enviroments, given how many players seem to suffer ranked anxiety when it comes to trying new and experimental decks. Why then would you lock the challenge to ranked classic?Hi Burza,
In the Shupe Challenge we must play Classic game mode, but Unranked does not count (it's Classic too). Is it intended or a bug? If it's a bug, will it be fixed or we must play Ranked matches for the Challenge Quests?
Is it intended or a bug?
Can we get the leader cards back? They are so awesome, bring them back and upgrade the leader models would make an excellent job. And it'd also be better if there are rarity & power filters in the game
Don't you see the models are low quality? And also the leader cards have better looking for the loading screen than those modelsUpgrade the leader models in what way exactly? Getting rid of leader cards and instead decoupling leaders and leader abilities is one of the best changes they ever did.
Do you have plans to change the Enslave/Ardal ability? It's so annoying to play against... I simply cannot put a 5 point engine or another essencial card to my deck cause I know that is gonna be stolen. Play a card, sweers. Play a card, stolen. Play a card, Invocation. Then renew the abilitie and stole another card.... Where's the fun in a game like this?
For the devs, there are numerous posts on the forum (myself included) who feel we are being cheated by either the matchmaking, the RNG or the card deal within the game far too regularly. What would the developers to say to those who feel resentment and anger towards a game that's supposed to be fun?
I'm not new, I play since the Gold immunity and the Enslave is the most annoying thing in this game in a long time, i play only casual games now and if I see Enslave I just forfeit.+1 and replying here simply to say again it's unacceptable. And if you're new, brunopplacona, GWENT wasn't like this at any point in its history. I expect something will be done.
RNG isn't a problem you say? Quite a lot of people beg to differ. There are different types of RNG and some are truly problematic, especially for a game that is supposed to be strategic.Most of these posts are yours and then some people agreed others disagreed. Please, let the devs focus on real problems because this isn't one. It's a phenomenon of modern communication: few people citing each other and suddenly thinking that they are many. I'm sure that you will disagree and of course you have the right to do so. But I think that it is not healthy to post this opinion in almost every discussion and then think that people agree but they are just tired of arguing. At least think about it.