PS: how did the sexism debate find its way to this thread?
Good point. I have not been diligent*. Back on-topic please.
*translation: didn't realise this WASN'T the sexism thread.
PS: how did the sexism debate find its way to this thread?
It doesn't need to be full frontal, rear view would be sufficient.
Actually of all the lists of wishes that I have for this game, I realize the most important one, the one that would render this game -or any game- impossible to play for me is controls. I remember finishing The Witcher and starting The Witcher 2 and how awkward the controls felt at first. How scared I was that I was not going to be able to play it. Some lags, delayed responses etc. When I clicked, I didnt feel or see the effect immediately. And I very vividly remember looking it up and seeing some people suggest using a controller. Nightmare! I can't use controllers for the life of me. I still have the first AC and I want to play it because my brother is a fan and I want to humor him but nope, I can't get over how odd those controls feel.
So I just wish nobody suggests using controllers for The Witcher 3 or any other game CDPR makes in the future because it's "easier that way". That's my wish. I think I read something about TW3 that made me feel somewhat relieved about this matter but I can't find it so my wish still stands.
They are developing each platform version of Witcher 3 separately,So I wouldn't worry too much about there being a control issue. From what I've read and seen in interviews up until this point they've said they will do their best utilizing each platforms control schemes. For the consoles - with Kinect voice commands and the PS4 light bar ,if it makes sense and fits the game, they will do it but not as a gimmick.
is the mature content and nudity toned down in witcher 3 compared to witcher 2?
i hope the mature content to be even better than it was in witcher 2, it would totally add to the fun factor.
is the mature content and nudity toned down in witcher 3 compared to witcher 2?
i hope the mature content to be even better than it was in witcher 2, it would totally add to the fun factor.
Hey, I'm greedy for more nude/sex with hot women in TW3. I also love money and I'm from the west does that make me evil.Sadly as the game grows more popular, and CDPR gets more greedier (who doesn't like money?).. game will be dumbed down and casualize. With casuality, even 13 years can play. But anyhow i seriously hope CDPR is NOT like Irrational game. They purposely make Eliz so flat when press initially complained about Eliz chest. Bear in mind there's no nudity in Bioshock. You have sexual and nudity in the big screen cinemas, but westerners are such conservative jokers.
imagine if CDPR is cool enough to even make an optional M rated scene of a threesome between Geralt, Yenniffer and Triss lol
I meant "neutral" as a decision the Geralt we know from the books would likely make when several possiblities are given. In TW2 I often had the feeling that the "book-Geralt" wouldn't act like any of the options given by CDPR. That might not be an issue for someone who doesn't know the books or doesn't care about the character and attitude of Geralt in those but to me it's very important. I try to play Geralt exactly in the way I personally see fit to the Geralt I know from the books. I want to keep him true to the canon if you want so. So maybe "neutral" was the wrong word. I meant something as Geralt's usual "fed-up attitude", distrusting most people and always wanting to follow his own path and being his own ruler. In TW2 for example we had to choose between Roche and Iorveth but both options felt kind of wrong to me (with Iorveth's path more wrong than Roche's). I just hope that we will always have an option that seems to stay true to the canon, true to Geralt's original character and attitude. Of course in the witcher world every decision comes with a price, no question. That should apply to every option, no matter if "neutral" or not. The book-Geralt is known for his attitude to piss into the wind at every possible occation. So staying true to the original Geralt probably wouldn't always be the wisest option if you want to avoid problems anyway....Good post, LordCrash. I basically agree with all your posts, only there shouldn't ALWAYS be a neutral option. Having to chose between one of two evils is one of the best things about the Witcher, as I'm sure you know. Being able to stay neutral in certain situations is very interesting indeed, but in my opinion there should always be a price attachted to it.